Legionary1

Indeed. I see that your purpose in assembling your 1940 set was to honor your mother; most commendable, that. My objective when I started 10 or so years ago was to assemble a complete set of all U.S coins issued during World War II, all dates, denominations inclusive The 1940 set is especially meaningful for me because both of my parents were born that year, just a couple of months apart. Certain issues I'll never be able to afford, such as the 1941-S walking liberty NGC MS67 and the 1945-P Mercury in NGC MS67 FB; with careful planning, however, none of the other issues are beyond my reach. The set is complete, except for the 1943-S walking Liberty in either NGC MS66+ or NGC MS67. Right now, my objective is increasing the quality of the specimens I have and reclaiming my throne from a certain usurper.....

Hello, Coinbuf: Thanks for getting back to me on that; I rather thought that was the situation. My 1940 set had a good run, #1 in the registry for six out of the last seven years. You'll just have to pardon me if I don't let you rest on your laurels....

My set is the 2020 NGC Best in Category; Coinbuf's set is the 2020 Best in Category. My problems are that the web page defaults to 'Best in Category'; I also can't access the NGC Best in Category rankings. IMHO, it rather defeats the purpose of a NGC registry by allowing PCGS-certified coins to be added.

How in the name of Eric P. Newman is it possible for different sets to have the same ranking? I am referring to my 1940 year set (which has been the #1 set in the registry for six out of the last seven years) and Coinbuf's 1940 set. My set has the #1 ranking for 2020, and so does his. Yesterday, my set was in the #1 position, and now it is #2. How is this at all possible?

Yes,. it is certainly mislabeled. So obvious a mistake by NGC should leave them on the hook for the price difference between a 1976 in MS68 and a 1976-S in PF68 cameo...