• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

DWLange

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    3,428
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    21

Posts posted by DWLange

  1. The nickels and other coins dated 2009 are destined to have the same history as the 1950-D nickel. These were widely hoarded in BU rolls and are thus common in MS but were seldom seen in circulation.

    I started collecting Jeffersons from circulation in the mid 1960s and never found a 1950(P) or 1950-D. I suppose the Philly coin was perceived as scarce by association, and the publicity given 1950-D nickels by the non-numismatic media led to many persons saving every nickel of that date.

  2. Quote

    I agree with the others that problem coins should be avoided.

    It depends on how severe is the problem. Details graded coins encompass a broad spectrum from truly hideous pieces to ones that are so nice the "problem" is difficult to discern. There are many very attractive coins that don't quite qualify for numeric grading yet are quite pleasing to the eye. I've bought a few near misses for my own collection, though always at an appropriate discount consistent with its overall value. I wrote on this topic a number of years ago: https://www.ngccoin.com/news/article/8146/

  3. Quote

    excellent article in the august 2022 issue on Lone Wolf Coins Part 2 by one, David W. Lange....

    Thanks, zadoc. Sadly, this is the last of my columns for The Numismatist. It's all addressed in the editor's message at the beginning of the August issue.

    As Kurt noted, The Numismatist has an online archive for use by ANA members, so the entire 35 years worth of my columns are found there. The last 20 years are also available at the NGC website under the header "News." Just click on that and then the "All News" pull-down to find USA Coin Album.

  4. One thing that has long fascinated me is how and why the San Francisco Mint struck all of its 1937 quarters with broader obverse rims than on those struck at Denver and Philly. I've written about this phenomenon a number of times, this being the most recent occasion:

    https://www.ngccoin.com/news/article/6667/

    It would be great if you could turn up any internal correspondence or die books regarding this oddity. I've seen it also on 1949-S dimes. Both of these issues wore quite differently than their East Coast and Midwest counterparts.