• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

jpcienkus

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    2,367
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by jpcienkus

  1. Did PCGS short this one on the dmpl grade, or is this just really good photography??

     

    I think you'll find, in hand, that this is an example of very *bad* photography. The contrast has been messed with to make the coin look like it has black and white cameo contrast. When you get it in hand, I'll bet it is far more moderate, and deserves the PL grade it got. Ebay sellers will often do this, to try and fool unsuspecting people into thinking they have a super rare DMPL coin when it isn't. Given the right tweaks, I can make a regular business strike look like a DMPL in a photograph.

     

    After reading Jason's post, I went back and took a closer look at the post. I need a reading comprehension refresher course!

  2. my name is nater222, and I also have a Prooflike addiction!

     

    Think I have my idea for my first registry set! Morgan CC PL and DMPL!!

    Sounds expensive so it will probably be a lifetime thing but oh well.

    Did PCGS short this one on the dmpl grade, or is this just really good photography??

     

    Wow! A '78 CC with 64 DPL! Sweet. I think the photo is trying to show off the mirrors. Can you post larger pictures? I'd love to own a '78 in DPL. Nice pick up.

  3. Thanks Irvin and Kenny. I thought the skin was cool and that was one reason I was drawn to it. Also, when viewing the blow up at Heritage, the head had full details. I didn't care whether it had the FH designation, as I've seen some with it that looked mushy.

     

    Edited to add: I also wanted a 1917 with the exposed right breast.

  4. I posted an Indian Eagle I purchased a few weeks. After sitting on it over the weekend I decided I did not want to keep it and returned it. There were a few more marks and copper spots visible in hand not visible from the pictures online that bothered me.

     

    I just picked up this raw example from a show (my first raw gold purchase) with a written guarantee from the dealer that it is not cleaned, not ex-jewelery, and will grade a minimum of AU58. The pictures from my iPhone do not do justice. It will be very interesting to see what grade it receives.

     

     

    Well....NGC determined my first and last raw gold coin purchase was indeed cleaned. Grrr...an important reminder of why I never buy raw gold. I have contacted the dealer about the refund. I'm waiting to get the coin back from NGC to finalize the refund - hopefully without issue based on the above.

     

    Since I learned of this my hunt continued for an Indian Eagle with nice (to me) eye appeal. I have found it incredibly difficult to find nice looking examples. I found an NGC MS64+ on Ebay that I would not touch (toning) for my collection and I write that only because it amazes me how banged up these coins are in MS grades. I have never seen so many MS62-64 coins that I would consider junk coins. Wow!

     

    I came across a coin that looked nice to me yesterday (online) and I picked up it. I spoke to the dealer about it before the purchase as well to clarify what I was seeing in the pictures. The small scratches over the S on the reverse appeared to be on the case for example (dealer confirmed). I look forward to getting the coin in hand to properly evaluate but here are the pics. Wish me luck (ha). PCGS AU58

     

     

    Matt, please see my PM response. Looks like a winner. Let me know your thoughts when you get it in hand.

     

    Joe