• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Walkerfan

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    5,176
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by Walkerfan

  1. Apology accepted. I hold no grudge against you, now, so I am prepared to move on. I do appreciate the positive things that you said.
  2. The above post has, thoroughly, angered me (which I’m sure was your trollish intent), so I must speak my mind: I never said that. Don’t put words in my mouth. And I don’t appreciate that other buffoon, RWB, implying that I am going to lose money, on my coin THAT I JUST PURCHASED, when I sell it before I die. Ridiculous! That is a really crappy thing to say and completely FALSE. What kind of bitter person says something like that?! He’s not a collector. He doesn’t buy anything. He just bashes other peoples’ numismatic items out of spite or jealousy. Most people don’t even pay attention to him. I am quite certain that I will far outlive both of you two old fools. I showed it to a TRUE expert and he agreed with me that the coin is mint state and likely under graded by one point. Besides, the coin has been in both NGC AND PCGS plastic, so it has been independently reviewed AND graded, by not just one, but TWO, of the leading services in the industry. Both agreed that it's Mint State. I thought this was supposed to be fun. This used to be a good place to post, 15 years ago, but it has really devolved. Many of the good people got fed up and left. Mostly trolls post here, now. It’s really sad, because it ruins it for the few good people who are still here and I feel bad for them. This is my last post on this topic…and I have serious doubts as to whether I am going to share anything else here, again. Registry only for me from now on…
  3. @RWB Okay. Fair enough. I don’t want to ever discourage Free thought and personal opinions.
  4. You're notorious for your lowball BS and everyone knows it. I'll be fine.
  5. @RWB and @Sandon You are entitled to your opinion and I will respect that. But, I see no rub in the areas that you mentioned. The coin looks almost like a 63 to me. The fields are a reflective, semi-prooflike with good luster. This is as nice of an 1869 that you'll find, without paying moon money. We'll just have to agree to disagree....
  6. Do you happen to know what it sold for back then? Edit to add: Sold for $2,350.00, in 2013...It was in NGC plastic back then. I checked NGC Auction Central.
  7. Probably retoned that way. They look stable and inconsequential. Looks great in hand. Not dark and barely noticeable. Luster is strong. Looks consistent for a 154 year old coin.
  8. Thanks. Osburn is the true expert in the Seated Dollar world. If it’s good enough for him, it’s good enough for me.
  9. I don’t care how good his research is… he sure needs grading lessons.
  10. Yeah, I was a little concerned about the light freckled toning, on the right facing side, of the obverse. I got it in hand, today, and man is it ever lustrous and nice. The toning is very subtle and barely noticeable, in the hand. Not dark at all. I am super happy with it. Thanks for your positive feedback.
  11. She is from the D ick Osburn Collection. I already have an Osburn coin (1844 in NGC plastic), so I had hoped to add, yet another, with that same pedigree (this time in PCGS plastic). Reconstruction Era Seated Dollars, in mint state, are scarce as hen's teeth! I am not bothered by the tiny toning freckles. They are not from foreign material and are not active or damaging the surface of the coin. Consistent for the grade, IMHO. This is the plate coin for Obverse 5 in the Osburn-Cushing Seated Dollar reference book. A Top 30 Variety, with misplaced digits visible in the denticles below the primary date (most likely 186). Clear-gold color and bits of tan-gold toning enrich the partially reflective surfaces of this attractive example. Mintage is a deceiving 423,700. In circulated grades, the 1869 is a prime issue, in this decade, of Philadelphia mint rarities. Most were exported to China and melted down. But, In Mint State, however, 1869 dollars are VERY rare, far rarer than Proofs, and are seldom encountered. Most high-grade coins are prooflike. What are your thoughts? I appreciate all feedback.
  12. Still grabbing nice Seated dollars, when I see them.
  13. This was brought to my attention by a member ATS. American businessman, author, rare coin expert, sports memorabilia expert and philanthropist. He was co-founder of Collectors Universe. He served as vice president of the Numismatic Guaranty Corporation He was only 58...
  14. Well, then PCGS is guilty of the same thing. Everybody knows that CAC Coins sell for a higher premium…whether it be in NGC plastic OR in PCGS plastic.
  15. Maybe this is only temporary, as CAC is updating their website and going live with grading very soon. If it is permanent; it will affect PCGS, as well. NGC will always be the best registry set program out there, IMHO. Keep up the good work NGC!!
  16. I saw that! Really cool to find a set like that. I’m not into two cent pieces but I still looked, as it was very interesting, and not something you see very often.
  17. @Coinbuf Very nice of you to do that. 🙂 The young man did a great job with the images. Good for both of you!
  18. I’ve had many good times, too, my friend. Life is all about balance.
  19. Thank You @zadok I appreciate your kind sentiments. Congrats on your achievements, as well. Numismatics has been such a Godsend for me. It has offered me hours and hours of learning, excitement and enjoyment. It is an escape and I find it comforting. It is also a very social hobby and I have made some great friendships. You also have something to show for your work, when you’re done, unlike spending your resources on intangibles. It is my hope that I can help and/or inspire future collectors by my experiences.
  20. When I said that I had no intention of being #1---I meant in the Walker Complete Set (I am currently #7). In the Walker One Per Date Set and Early Set---I have won awards for being #1 Nine Times. And YES, those were most certainly 'Niche' categories for me that I excelled in. I have since been dethroned but enjoyed my time at the top. NGC has graciously given me icons that will forever be displayed, on my profile, which attest to that and are badges of honor for me. Also, my banners displayed in my signature line read 'Top Ranking Competitive Set', since I am STILL in the top Three of those two categories. Nice of our host to do this as a permanent recognition and to make it FUN for participants. It is a nice little reward for their work and effort. And YES, if I was knocked out of a high ranking position, by just a small margin; I'd likely upgrade to reclaim my status, if it wasn't too cost prohibitive.
  21. The Pittsburgh ANA coin Discussion sounds very interesting, to me, as I am quite fascinated with psychology. Here is a view into this registry cat’s psyche: When I started my registry set; I knew that I would never be number one. I never intended to be And I never wanted to be. Not to say that it wouldn’t be nice but that was not my main goal. So, does that mean that I did not ‘win’ the competition? Absolutely not, as I was competing only with myself. To me that was great. To see how relevant and high quality of a set that I could build. Then compare it on a worldwide level. That made it super cool. I did the best that I could and I am very proud. It was fun, interesting and challenging to me to see how high I could go and how high I could score. And it is 100% complete, which is an excellent feeling of accomplishment. Funny thing for me is that, if I wanted to; I could continue on and upgrade more but that seems pointless to me, because I am satisfied with each specimen that I have selected for each and every slot. It seems foolish to me to pay thousands and thousands of dollars more to improve on a coin or coins that I already love. So, there is kind of a point of diminishing returns for me, when it comes to that. To me—even though I am not number one; I still have achieved a high level and a high ranking and it is fun to show it off to the world, so they cannot only share my joy but maybe learn something from it, too. I like to use my set as a teaching tool. I enjoy sharing information and writing descriptions and taking pictures. Finally, the registry serves as an inventory system for me. It helps me keep track of everything. I also like the last thing that you said…that you were #3, in that your coins are valued quasi-family members and not inventory or temporary investments. That is a very unique way of putting it! Not sure that I feel this way, exactly, but I will say this: I worked too damn hard to put my set together and I enjoy it, tremendously, so it is not something that I am interested in just flipping or turning a quick profit on. One of the number one rules that a dealer has is that he never falls in love with any of his coins. Well, I’m here to tell you that it is too late for me. That is part of my joy…to own something that is irreplaceable and rare and beautiful. Not to say that I will never sell, as I never say never, but I will say that it would take a lot for me to part with it. You and I are truly pure and refined collectors. We have a real passion for the game. I intend to enjoy it as long as I can.
  22. What an amazing set and every coin collector’s fantasy!
  23. Here are my Denver and San Francisco coins: My Denver coin is in an old, blue, no-prong PCGS holder and is a 64. I grabbed it off eBay, back in 2011, because I LOVED the luster and strike. My 16-S is a PCGS 64 with a CAC sticker. They are the rarest of the three and I can't believe how much that particular grade/CAC sticker combo has appreciated. They have essentially DOUBLED in price, since I've purchased mine. Sadly, I have no suitable image of my Philly coin. I snagged that off of the eBay, too, about 11 or 12 years ago. Likewise it's a PCGS 64. I built most of my early Walker set using that grade. I felt it was optimal, as you could cherry-pick gems without paying the HUGE premiums. MS 65 is where the Early Walkers really JUMP in price. I grabbed it for $500! They now retail for $1700, in 64, and gems are $3250, today. Wish you could see it. It has beautiful luster and some lovely rim toning. Strike is good, too. I'll have to work on getting a good image for it. You Know....People do a bunch of crying and complaining about eBay but it was instrumental for me in building my set. I'll bet that almost half of my set came from there, either, directly or indirectly. It's STILL very relevant to me, even today.