0
  • entries
    11
  • comments
    0
  • views
    1,294

About this journal

Finished my Walker middle date set.

Just before the end of 2016; I had finished my Walker short set (1941-1947), which was not a very easy task, but it was the least difficult of the three segments (Early Walkers-1916-1933, Middle Walkers-1934-1940 and Short Set Walkers-1941-1947) that the Walker series is broken up into. Now, I have finished the next tier up---my Middle date Walker set, which I believe does not get nearly enough credit. The S minted coins of 1934-1940 are all VERY challenging to find nice and are only getting MUCH more difficult to locate and are a good investment, imho. Prices have really come down a lot, since 2005-2008, but despite that, the coins themselves are still relatively pricey and are only getting much more scarce and more difficult to find nice, imho. Much more so, than they were 10 years ago, and much more so than current price levels would indicate. People truly underestimate the difficulty and availability, of the middle date Walkers, and they shouldn't, as they are VERY challenging and rare and tough to find well produced with original skin. Finding one with both is truly rare.

The very last coin that I needed for the Middle Date set was somewhat of an irony----It was the 1936-S. I used to correspond with a veteran, fellow Walker collector who liked all original coins and he searched for many years before finding a nice 1936-S coin for his Walker set, which was the last coin that he needed for the 65 coin full Walker set, as he demanded only original pieces. It turned out to be the last coin that I was searching for to complete my middles dates, as well, which I found peculiar, hence the irony here. So, when I saw this original, sharply impressed 1936-S coin with full thumb and stem lines on the obverse, full eagle's feathers on the reverse & CAC-stickered.....I just had to have it to complete my middle dates! Also, I thought of my old friend....

The only issue that I see is the left-leg (center) skirtlines of Miss Liberty, on the obverse, are not fully struck up and it has some chatter, up the center of that leg, but everything else about the coin is just lovely and the surfaces are very smooth and all original. Although the toning is not richly colorful; I would still call it rather attractive. It is an original, mostly white, lightly speckle toned and not 'mottled' toned coin, of which I feel the latter is a negative connotation. That discoloration on the breast is likely not rub, either---I'm guessing it is as produced and a lightly toned anomaly. The luster is great, too. This coin fits my eclectic set very well, as it is unique and well-produced, which is kind of the theme of my set. I have learned that I had better pick up original Walkers, when I can, and I have also grown to appreciate their distinctive beauty and scarcity.

Sir John Albanese likes this coin, too, as it is green stickered. lol This is an instance where I feel that CAC is really useful to me. It reassures me that the coin is likely original and has no rub (which I will be able to tell, when I scope it with the loupe), as there are likely no luster breaks or friction areas given the images, the location of the toned area and the condition of the rest of the coin. This is also my 16th CAC stickered coin. However, that is just a statistical, yet irrelevant, fact, as my set was started before CAC's inception, so most of my coins have never even been seen by CAC.

Now, I am also 95.38% complete with my entire mint state Walker Full set (1916-1947) and, of course, 100% done with my short and middle date Walker sets.  I have chosen all gems and premium gems for my 19 coin middle date set. Of the six 'S minted' coins, which are the rarest and most expensive, half (3 coins) are MS 66 premium gems and the rest (3 coins) are MS 65 gems. The Philly coins are all MS 66 premium gems, except for one that is a MS 65 gem (the 1935-P, in an OGH), that I feel would surely grade MS 66, today, if resubmitted, but I am leaving it be, as I like the OGH and the price difference is not worth it to me. The Denver coins are all MS 65 gems with just one MS 66 premium gem (the 1939-D, in an old NGC fatty)---also under graded, imho.

Just three early Walkers to go and I'll fulfill a lifelong ambition. This has been a nearly 12 year journey, in the making, for me. Nearly nine years, of which, I have been actively building this set. I laughed, when I was told from the onset, that it takes about a decade to build a quality full MS Walker set. Well, I'm certainly not laughing, anymore, as I'm finding this to be painstakingly TRUE! I think that you really have to love this series to dedicate this much patience, time and effort to it, which I do. When I am finally done; I am going to just sit back and RELAX and enjoy. WHEW! What a ride it has been up to this point!

Cheers to all!!

WF

7b9877bf-02c0-4c28-b05a-4500a694aacb_zps

 

71abb2ef-3819-47cd-b9b0-e9e529ac2900_zps

 

Entries in this journal

Picked up this well produced, colorful gem

1937-S PCGS MS 66 CAC I participated for the first time, ever, in a Legend sale. There were some absolutely stunning, original beauties in that sale, including the 'Northern lights' Morgan dollars. Walkers and other series stunners were no exception, too, as I found this wonderful colorful premium gem. It is VERY well struck with full skirts, well rounded & defined thumb, full head and sharp eagle's breast and trailing leg. The obverse is very unique with toning of rose, cranberry and

Walkerfan

Walkerfan

Finished My Walker Short Set

It was my year end goal and an enlightening experience. While I was building my early set; I had hit a roadblock and was getting burned out looking for good coins, in the right grades, so I decided to work on the short set, as a relaxing diversion----a way of keeping me involved, while still looking for the really rare and expensive stuff. It was just some cheap fun, at first! It also had some overlap with my one per date set that I was also working on, as I had almost all of those early coi

Walkerfan

Walkerfan

Why I like Walkers and my evolution as a collector

From humble beginnings to where I am today As a grade school child of 8 or 9 years old, my dad got me started on classic coinage (Buffs, Mercs & Walkers among others) by giving me Blue Whitman folders and quite a few circulated coins for me to fill them with that he had obtained, in his younger days. I was never able to fill that 1938-D Walker hole and that really challenged and intrigued me. Those old blue folders listed the mintage numbers underneath that hole and it was LOW for the

Walkerfan

Walkerfan

Finally secured my final San Francisco Walker needed for my short set.

It's all downhill from here! The 20 coin short (1941-1947) set may be considered a relatively easy set to put together, when compared to the intermediate set (1934-1940) and, especially, the early set (1916-1933), but finding well-struck, lustrous, S-minted, 1940s coins is not an easy task by any means. The last nice 1943 S MS 66 coin that I saw and that I really liked sold almost 3 years ago back in December of 2013. I decided to pull the trigger on this one, because the strike is abo

Walkerfan

Walkerfan

This one just spoke to me

And I give in to a good strike and luster. A couple of years ago; I purchased a 1947 P Walker coin in NGC MS 66+ that I really liked and that is fully original. I also liked the 1947 P coin, because it gave me just a few more Registry points for my Date Set than it's Denver brother, and I got it for a lot less than I had thought that I would have to pay. Anyway, my plan was always to make it a matched set by finding a nice 1947 D coin in NGC MS 66+ to go along with it. I had the opportun

Walkerfan

Walkerfan

Coins like this one really help to keep me in the game.

I really LIKE fresh material, too.   And I was drawn to this one like a moth to the flame.Fresh to the market and in an older NGC #7 slab that's in perfect condition. This coin is 99% bright white with just a very light skin. The strike is freakishly sharp on both the obverse and reverse, even considering the fact that the 1934 P is, generally, a rather well produced issue. The fields are virtually pristine. Luster looks pretty decent, as well. This one looks so much better than the MS

Walkerfan

Walkerfan

I finally completed a set!

100% done with my Date Set of Walkers After six years of working on my Early Set and Date set; I finally finished my One Per Date Set. I lucked onto a 1921-D and I had pondered buying it but the dealer's images looked like it had dull luster. The next day, in my office at work, I looked at the NGC images and the luster looked amazing for an early Walker. I couldn't get any work done, as that coin was on my mind. It also had a great strike and was problem free. I decided to try to buy it a

Walkerfan

Walkerfan

Walking another step forwards

1935 is a good year!! Well, here we are right before Christmas 2014 and I was gonna cool it for a while with my purchases, since I just picked up a nice 42-S rattler & a 41-S OGH both in MS 65 for my date set. I punched up my normal 'honey-hole' sites and there she was staring me RIGHT in the face. The sharpest MS 65 35-D that I've seen in almost ANY grade and in a 'rattler' with a green bean no less. I was hoping to slip in and get her for around retail (maybe even less? HA!) but W

Walkerfan

Walkerfan

Challenging San Francisco Wartime Walker

A Crown Jewel for my Short Set I am having such a wonderful time just happily filling in my Walker Date Set and my Walker Short Set. It is sooo much fun with very little monetary outlay.       BUT the S minted coins of the 1940s are NOT as easy as one might think that they are and they offer QUITE the challenge. I have been searching for about a year now, already. IMHO the 1942-S is the MOST difficult coin to find with a decent strike and is more difficult than even the 1941-S AND th

Walkerfan

Walkerfan

Market Trends and Originality

Lucky 1947 coin This is my highest graded Walker to date (MS 66 plus---I picked it up a few months ago) and it is a beautifully original, golden, pear-green & apricot, untouched gem. The strike is also sufficiently above average for the issue. It is just slightly rarer than it's 1947-D brethren, except in superb gem condition, and they are not known any higher than that (MS 67 grade.) The luster is just amazing. This is a lower mintage Philadelphia issue. But being the last date of the s

Walkerfan

Walkerfan

Long Term Goal Reached

IMPORTANT NEWP Well, I have always wanted to write a Journal Entry. I promised myself that, SOMEDAY, when I got to a certain numismatic milestone that it would happen, since I wanted to write a proper and appropriate one, after all. As it so happens, TODAY is that day and I have FINALLY reached that momentous point! I joined the NGC Registry here back in 2005 and I then made an attempt to buy some Early Walkers for my set. I bought the 1917 PCGS MS 64, 1918 NGC MS 64, 1918-D PCGS MS 63,

Walkerfan

Walkerfan

0