• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Week #216 - A Golden Question

15 posts in this topic

QUESTION:

 

What series of small size notes were “Redeemable in Gold,” but were not actual gold certificates?

 

 

 

Good Luck!!

 

Our first place winner will receive a coupon for 1 note graded for free under the Economy tier. (you must have an active account with PMG to utilize this coupon, to obtain an account please call customer service at 877-764-5570) A prize will be given to a randomly selected participant with the correct answer.

 

REMINDER: The Numisma-Quest ends/ended on Saturday at midnight EST. Entries after that time will not be valid. See the Trivia Info post for more details.

 

When you post your answer, only the administrators can see it. Stop back this Monday. We will make all the posts visible and announce the winners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUESTION:

 

What series of small size notes were “Redeemable in Gold,” but were not actual gold certificates?

 

 

ANSWER:

 

All 1928 series Federal Reserve Notes (all denominations included)

 

 

Congratulations to our first place winner rtpjr, who will receive a coupon for 1 note graded for free under the Standard tier.

 

Congratulations to our runner up winner BankNote1, you will be receiving a coupon for 1 note graded for free under the economy tier.

 

 

Thanks for playing this weeks Numisma-Quest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I was the only person with the correct answer. First off all denominations is not correct, the 1$ bill is a silver cert. the only other person that was close left out the 10,000$ bill. And each denomination is a series of that date. Please reply, Thank You.

Link to comment
Share on other sites