• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Post your most recent acquisition: US
8 8

20,909 posts in this topic

Rev, nice looking Indian! (thumbs u Congrats on the Prez's.

 

Bruce, I've heard of focusing down before, but Wow! :applause:

 

Mike, good looking Barbers. (thumbs u

 

Rey, attractive Lexington you got there. (thumbs u

 

 

Unfortunately I decided to not bid at FUN as the same grade/date/mm coin I was most interested in, a PCGS MS66FBL 1951-S Franklin, was on eBay 2 days later, and there was also a 1951 PCGS MS66FBL for sale on eBay at the same time. Both the eBay coins had quite nice toning for the date/mm (and were probably out of the same Mint Set) so I decided to hold off on the FUN sale and bid on eBay as I thought I could get the '51-S for less. The 1951-S at FUN went for $805 (juice included), and low and behold I got sniped on both the eBay P and S Frankies, with them going for $817 and $937 respectively. C'est la vie.

 

It's rather amusing :frustrated: because I spent several years looking for a decent '51-S and finally pulled the trigger on a PCGS MS66 one in November 2007 as a not too shabby placeholder. So, here come 2 nice ones in less than one week, and I'm SOL.

 

The coin gods are funny though, and yesterday when I was browsing through a large box of raw Frankies I found a nearly fully white, raw '51-S in ~64 with, IMO, FBL. It certainly should FBL at PCGS and has a serious shot at doing so at NGC. FBL is quite tough for the date, so I was VERY happy to run across it. It's odd how you can not find a date/mm for the longest time and then it seems to rain them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got this one tonight 05/29. Anyone think the small album friction will take away from any grade?I think this could make NGC 63 or 64"STAR". Thanks for looking.

61133-86toner.jpg.b3ed49eb1ebf9ed11d08a4eb4a949af2.jpg

61134-86toner2.jpg.2824dcf7ad3523e7733d4596c217d4b3.jpg

Edited by prudden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I'm missing something under the toning, it's at least a 64. I submitted 3 or 4 similarly toned for grading. None of them got a star, and one came back in a BB for AT. The BB reverse looked much like yours.

 

Nice Morgan!

 

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rev, nice looking Indian! (thumbs u Congrats on the Prez's.

 

Bruce, I've heard of focusing down before, but Wow! :applause:

 

Mike, good looking Barbers. (thumbs u

 

Rey, attractive Lexington you got there. (thumbs u

 

Prudden Great Morgan (thumbs u

:banana::headbang: (thumbs u :applause:^^

Edited by harvey8542
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I'm missing something under the toning, it's at least a 64. I submitted 3 or 4 similarly toned for grading. None of them got a star, and one came back in a BB for AT. The BB reverse looked much like yours.

 

Nice Morgan!

 

Chris

 

Please noooo. AT would be bad. Almost as bad as the "artificial color" I got on my Indian cent. I still can't understand how it was done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice coins everyone. Here are some crack outs that arrived over the last few days. All now live in albums.

 

Obverse die crack is fairly cool with very light die clashing on both sides. These little coins are tough to image.

IMG_3736.jpg

IMG_3729.jpg

IMG_3733.jpg

 

Bought raw. The light scratches on the obverse are not visible to the naked eye.

WLH1934DObv.jpg

WLH1934DRev.jpg

 

Liked it and it fits with the balance of the set.

WLHPCGS121920DObv.jpg

WLHPCGS121920DRev.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really liking that 1865 3CN in AU 58.

 

How difficult are these to find in AU 58 ?

Aside from the early to mid 1880's are

they readily available - or impossible to find ?

 

 

Edited by Elbesaar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

A fellow Barber collector - turned dealer recently - and just sold me this

great looking 1898-P Half.

 

I just can't resist a good looking Barber... :o

 

61169-1898-PHalfPCGSVF35.JPG.e8e012dff3bbbb1b69b6109d73083279.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are compliments of Bushie boy and the knotheads in Congress ;) Is this a great country or what? lol

 

DSC01656.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prudden, fun Morgan. (thumbs u

 

Kbsig, some nice lookin' Morgans there! (thumbs u

 

Chabsentia, congrats on the modern commems. (thumbs u

 

Murty, nice '83-O. (thumbs u

 

Hoard, good lookin' group of coins. (thumbs u

 

Dwaine, that's a nice looking SLH w/arrows. (thumbs u

 

Mike, just wondering, are you going to have the Barber design engraved on your tombstone? :baiting: Nice looking 1/2. (thumbs u

 

Rons, I always liked that WWII set. Congrats. (thumbs u

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Mike, just wondering, are you going to have the Barber design engraved on your tombstone? :baiting: Nice looking 1/2. (thumbs u

 

 

:o

 

doh!

 

61208-55848-1893SHalfPCGS58Holder-1-1--1.jpg.aff7d427e37ad2499bf80c15645dd09f.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few nice additions to the Whitman...

 

1903-P = PCGS 40

1903-O = PCGS 45

1907-O = PCGS 30

1913-D = PCGS 45

 

 

 

61232-1903-OHalfPCGSXF45.JPG.5868dc30e4e83587c71bae1e778ad9e3.JPG

61233-1903-PHalfPCGSXF40.JPG.bcba4daae1faed6f81d6fa7e04aa4585.JPG

61234-1907-OHalfPCGSVF30.JPG.0bf952d81533975f3871ffb4f43b2de1.JPG

61235-1913-DHalfPCGSXF45.JPG.1e576a24fa89366c7c8c6c2c17fea23f.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
8 8