Looks like SGS has expanded into the realm of Morgan Dollars...

[GoYankees]

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=39465&item=8315814977&rd=1

 

I thought SGS only grades coins at "70"?

[gmarguli]

The coin actually looks decent. Further proof that you can't grade a coin from a picture.

[cpm9ball]

My last dealing with Abon involved '82 Washington commems that were graded SGS PF70. Both of the coins had multiple nicks visible to the naked eye on Washington's face and the muzzle of the horse. At least I can say that Abon was prompt with my refund, but I do wonder if SGS shouldn't revamp their OJT Program for Graders.

 

Chris

[EZ_E]

The coin actually looks decent. Further proof that you can't grade a coin from a picture.

 

Pictures do bite for grading. They only give you an idea but this by no means looks like a 66 to me.

[HaydenTubbs]

The coin actually looks decent. Further proof that you can't grade a coin from a picture.

I agree,the picture almost makes it look like it's accurately graded

It's probably really and AU-58

[nwcs]

It's a mislabeled holder. They meant MS 69.

[Connecticoin]

It amazes me that nothing can be done about this systematic screwing of thousands of customers. The FTC could probably do something about it, but probably no one who has lost a ton of money (i.e. the New England Rare Coin Galleries case) and brought it to their attention.

[Leothelion]

If I send this guy an educational email, I might end up getting banned from bidding in his auctions!

 

Leo

[K6AZ]

One thing the picture does show are heavy abrasions on the neck. This coin is nowhere near 66.