• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

1984 penny with something weird
1 1

18 posts in this topic

I'm trying to figure out why it looks as if the penny was "skinned" for lack of a better word. Any insight would be greatly appreciated. 

CM240417-231948007.jpg

CM240417-232002009.jpg

CM240417-232109013.jpg

CM240417-232059012.jpg

CM240417-232130015.jpg

Edited by Tiffybaby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum. 
If by “skinned” you mean the missing metal on the right front of Monticello, that is the result of zinc rot. Your coin has a zinc core that is plated with (mostly) copper. When the plating gets a nick or scratch, the zinc inside is exposed to the air, and starts to corrode. That often causes more of the plating to flake off, exposing even more of the core, and perpetuating the process. This is very common on damaged cents minted after  the composition was changed in 1982.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to the forum!
 

It looks to me like it possibly had some plating blisters to begin with that actually broke open exposing the zinc core to rot in agreeance with @Just Bob as is common with these cents having years in circulation and questionable history with exposure to environmental damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree that this is a damaged zinc Lincoln cent.  This only correction is that the reverse shows the Lincoln Memorial, not Monticello.  @Just Bob is a much better numismatist than I am, so please don't consider this any discount to his ability.  He knows his stuff.

Edited by The Neophyte Numismatist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2024 at 12:51 PM, Tiffybaby said:

Is cleaning change bad from a collectors standpoint?

  The term "cleaning" refers to nearly any chemical or abrasive process that affects the surface of a coin, even wiping the coin with a cloth. Today's collectors regard "cleaning" as an impairment that makes the coin less desirable and, therefore, less valuable. Coins can be "conserved" using solvents such as acetone that remove surface dirt without affecting the coin's surface and purportedly with processes used by experts.

   A circulated, damaged 1984 cent is worth only face value whether it has been "cleaned" or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2024 at 12:51 PM, Tiffybaby said:

Cleaned? This is the way that received it from the store. Is cleaning chamge bad from a collectors standpoint?

Cleaned coins, as @Sandon said are coins that have been modified abrasively on the surface. Cleaned coins aren't exactly "bad", but there not "good" either. As for you getting it from the store, it still could have been cleaned in it's life. Heck, maybe somebody used it for a school project. The only reason I suggested it being cleaned is the pits in it's surface. I've seen those on cleaned coins, they usually are hiding beneath corrosion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2024 at 12:52 PM, ThePhiladelphiaPenny said:

Cleaned coins, as @Sandon said are coins that have been modified abrasively on the surface. Cleaned coins aren't exactly "bad", but there not "good" either. As for you getting it from the store, it still could have been cleaned in it's life. Heck, maybe somebody used it for a school project. The only reason I suggested it being cleaned is the pits in it's surface. I've seen those on cleaned coins, they usually are hiding beneath corrosion.

This is true but 1984 cents were particularly prone to blistering (even very tiny ones) of the copper plating. Blisters eventually become holes, which then become craters. Only truly obsessive storage care can delay the damage. 

Edited by VKurtB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2024 at 7:47 AM, The Neophyte Numismatist said:

Agree that this is a damaged zinc Lincoln cent.  This only correction is that the reverse shows the Lincoln Memorial, not Monticello.  @Just Bob is a much better numismatist than I am, so please don't consider this any discount to his ability.  He knows his stuff.

Did I really call the Lincoln memorial Monticello? I must be slipping. Thanks for the correction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2024 at 3:12 PM, Just Bob said:

Did I really call the Lincoln memorial Monticello? I must be slipping. Thanks for the correction.

No worries.  Never for a second did I think you were legitimately confused.  I attribute it to being late and working fast.  Just wanted the OP to know you are solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2024 at 2:17 PM, VKurtB said:

This is true but 1984 cents were particularly prone to blistering (even very tiny ones) of the copper plating. Blisters eventually become holes, which then become craters. Only truly obsessive storage care can delay the damage. 

Good to know. Thank you @VKurtB. Can someone explain why these mostly zinc to copper cents blister in the first place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2024 at 1:25 PM, ThePhiladelphiaPenny said:

Good to know. Thank you @VKurtB. Can someone explain why these mostly zinc to copper cents blister in the first place?

I do not recall the exact terminology, but it happens because of the heat that is generated at the time of the strike.   That creates an air bubble between the zinc core and the copper plating.   There is a better more in-depth explanation that I read once, just don't remember where I read that at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2024 at 11:51 AM, Tiffybaby said:

Cleaned? This is the way that received it from the store. Is cleaning chamge bad from a collectors standpoint?

Yes. It is bad. NEVER clean your coins! Also understand that while you may have received a coin, any coin can be cleaned and any coin with a number of decades of circulation has a chance of it being cleaned long before you obtained it. I personally don't think the coin in this thread was cleaned. The copper plating doesn't necessarily turn chocolate brown all at once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
1 1