Edwardram Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Looks repunched or doubled. What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JKK Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 I think not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenstang Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Can’t be repunched, they stopped hand punching dies in 1989. Looks like Machine Doubling. NeverEnoughCoins09 and Coinbuf 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coinbuf Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 You need to research how coins are made, there was no hand punching of mintmarks in 1993, thus there cannot be any RPM's. Simple worthless strike doubling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandon Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 (edited) This 1993-P Roosevelt dime doesn't appear to have a repunched mintmark. One photo shows a light secondary image that is likely strike doubling. Doubleddie.com states that "in 1990 and 1991 the Mint began applying the mint mark for circulating coins to the master die. After 1994 the mint mark was applied directly to the original model for all U.S. coins thus ending the RPM and OMM era." See https://www.doubleddie.com/58243.html, which also includes good photos of actual RPMs. Neither doubleddie.com, varietyvista.com, nor NGC VarietyPlus lists any RPMs for Roosevelt dimes dated after 1989. Edited January 18 by Sandon NeverEnoughCoins09 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
