Hinkle Posted August 24, 2020 Posted August 24, 2020 So I've been working on this dime for about a week and a half. Doing research thinking how some of the date and lettering are like this. If you look at the G in GOD, it tells me its somewhat doubling. And some on TRUST. Maybe it's die deterioration doubling. And look at the ear, that keeps me wondering to. Cool coin though, it kept me busy for a little bit. Lol
Coinbuf Posted August 24, 2020 Posted August 24, 2020 Just struck from a very tired and worn out die. KarenHolcomb 1
Greenstang Posted August 25, 2020 Posted August 25, 2020 Well worn dies on both sides. KarenHolcomb 1
James_OldeTowne Posted August 25, 2020 Posted August 25, 2020 Agreed - die erosion. I guess in the 1970s, the mint ran those dies to exhaustion to save money.
KarenHolcomb Posted August 26, 2020 Posted August 26, 2020 70's, 80'd, 90's...heck, I'd like to see a Dime from any year prior to 2000 that wasn't mushy and worn.
VKurtB Posted August 26, 2020 Posted August 26, 2020 3 minutes ago, KarenHolcomb said: 70's, 80'd, 90's...heck, I'd like to see a Dime from any year prior to 2000 that wasn't mushy and worn. If you go back far enough, back into the silver era, they exist. But you’re right. From 1965 to 2000, they weren’t so impressive. KarenHolcomb 1
VKurtB Posted August 26, 2020 Posted August 26, 2020 (edited) 2 minutes ago, KarenHolcomb said: @VKurtB hi. Good to umm, err, read(?) you again, too. Some SMS year dimes are very nice too. Edited August 26, 2020 by VKurtB
KarenHolcomb Posted August 26, 2020 Posted August 26, 2020 @VKurtB, thanks. Nice to read you as well Sir. Yes, I have the SMS Sets and you are correct. In my defense, I didn't include the years below 1970 in my comment. I don't look at my coins much anymore but I seem to recall thinking that the QC standards were severely lacking from around 1979 on with regard to most circulating coins struck. I could be off though.
VKurtB Posted August 26, 2020 Posted August 26, 2020 8 hours ago, KarenHolcomb said: @VKurtB, thanks. Nice to read you as well Sir. Yes, I have the SMS Sets and you are correct. In my defense, I didn't include the years below 1970 in my comment. I don't look at my coins much anymore but I seem to recall thinking that the QC standards were severely lacking from around 1979 on with regard to most circulating coins struck. I could be off though. Well.... 1979 surely is the bottom of the barrel for some things that should be easy peasy, like a decent mint mark on a proof coin, for cryin’ out loud. But hey, it was the Carter administration and there was a malaise....