One sweet walker - grade posted

[clarkbar04]

Not much to complain about, booming satiny luster, and as good of a strike as you can find on a 45-S. breast and leg feathers appear to be missing in the pics but that is a result of the lighting.

 

 

I guess it was a bit weaker than I remembered it on the reverse features. PCGS MS66

 

Also made an 87-S morgan in 63PL on this submission, so not bad.

 

 

 

[KMAG100]

That is one sweet Walker. ... Clark.....I'd go 67 on it, maybe 66+ if the area around the sun is contact marks opposed to just toning.

[clarkbar04]

Thanks! There is just a little bit of light toning in that area.

[physics-fan3.14]

Walkers are one of my weak areas in grading (marks can hide really easily). However, I don't see anything on yours that would keep it from a 67. The luster and eye appeal look really strong.

[johnny9434]

nice walker and good grade by the looks of it. nice pick up

[Mark T]

Looks like a nice solid 67 to me.

[Walkerfan]

Very smooth & lustrous but likely dipped. Strike is decent for the issue. I'd go MS 66.

[Raisethis2]

I dunno. I see 1 tiny hit in the spread out wing and a but of "rub" on her leg. That's all. My first thought was Ms 67.

[Danye West]

67

[clarkbar04]

PCGS graded this an MS66. I guess it is a little bit weaker than I imagined it on the reverse features. Still a super coin.