'72 doubled die

[joeyuk]

Just looking for some opinions. Has some light toning I find attractive.

 

 

 

[physics-fan3.14]

This one is tough, but I'm going to err on the side of caution and say AU-58.

[wdrob]

I am in the AU-58 camp as well but I sure do like that 72 DDO .. (thumbs u

 

 

 

 

[Coindude]

AU 58, looks like rub on the lower steps on the reverse. The obverse is hard to tell if it has rub or not. This is the biggie though, I can clearly see the die marker on the reverse above the "D" in "UNITED".

[johnny9434]

i agree that sure is one nice ddo. ill go au55/58

[yonico]

AU58 here as well. a really nice coin!

[Walkerfan]

An attractive coin---AU 55-58 IMHO.

[Raisethis2]

AU 58. slight rub on upper cheek.

[jpcienkus]

I don't know this series so I'll refrain from a grade but I think it's a very attractive DDO.

[joeyuk]

Thanks. The coin has a nice look.I just couldn't tell if it was rub or the toning.

Technical grade out the window she is still pretty.

[Kurtdog]

That thing's a killer! What error number is it?

[BillJones]

I agree with the AU-58 grade. On a lucky day it might make an MS-61,Brown holder, it would be a weak example for the grade.

[joeyuk]

CONECA: 1-O-I-CW | Crawford:CDDO-001

Wexler: WDDO-001 | FS#:1C-033.3

 

Most call this the big one but die # 4 seems to be highly sought after.