Sorry posted by MAILMAN

[CSJournals-migration]

for loss of Ike points.

 

Not sure if it was because of me, but I made a request to check some point values. The 1977 & 1978 MS66 were way out of line compared to the value and points for MS67 coins. Sorry to put a damper on everyone's point gains. Have a great day! MAILMAN

 

See more journals by MAILMAN

[moondoggy]

Hey no need for apologies. Although I only collect proofs I'm sure I speak for most here when I say I'm glad you caught the error. I'd rather have my sets with the correct info than have the wrong info misleading me along the way. I think it is the CS's responsibility to assist and question NGC with anything they see out of the norm. I for one applaud your instincts on this matter.

Well Done MAILMAN !!!!

[coinsbygary]

Easy come, easy go. I still have a net gain, so it can't be too bad.

Gary

[nunfa0]

No worries mate. I did lose some points but who cares!! Like the others have said it is better that the points are correct.

[newprepper]

The only ones who will care are the registry game people

[TD Henson]

I did the same with Roosevelt dimes several weeks ago. I'm a believer that if it looks wrong and is wrong then it should be fixed. Good job pointing out an error. Can you imagine keeping up to this Registry?

 

 

[Ultra Cameo Collection]

I own a 1971 PF69UC ike that is far from rare or expensive, yet they put a point value of 3292 for this coin. WOW a $50 coin worth that many points is crazy.

 

Also this same coin in my 1971 proof set is only worth 285 points, I thought they did away with 1 coin being worth 2 different point values.

 

WHO KNOWS?

[SPHansen]

Always best to have the correct numbers... does anyone know how they arrive at the point values in the first place? Curious

[mailman1959]

I think it's based on the "more points" = "more collectors" theory?....