1880/9 Toner Opinions Please

[mhomei]

[mhomei]

Just fyi I snapped about 100 pics ...well 94 of them suck and this is by far the best pic I have ever taken......

[Coincrazed74]

OMG, the toning on that is beautiful! I think it's an excellent Morgan bud! I would guess MS64, if that's the opinion you are looking for. JMHO.

 

CC

[nk1nk]

Looks like a details label?

 

Nick

[nk1nk]

I wasn't able to finish that post for some reason. The toning looks ok to me, so im curious as to what the problem is.

 

Nick

[truthteller]

Artificially toned with the center dipped out white.

 

 

 

TRUTH

[coinman_23885]

I'll guess uncirculated details, artificial or questionable toning. The color progression is odd, and it appears almost as if the toning is sitting on the coin, an indicator of artificial toning. Additionally, as was pointed out, the label appears purple (and indicator of a "details" holder), and I don't see any sign of cleaning or other damage in the images.

[mhomei]

yes

1880/9 S VAM 11

Uncirculated Details

Artificially Toned

 

is exactly what the label says

I was very disapointed in this one I was expecting MS64 *

 

 

[jom]

Well, I'll tell you that is one of the prettier AT coins I've seen if true. Wow.

 

It sure beats the out of some of those Modern ASE "toners" you see in graded slabs....

 

jom

[JOBESSI]

I've started an AT dansco, yes I said AT, . If u wanna let it go message me a price!

[mhomei]

I am not convinced that it is AT,, just because NGC says so I think I will send this to Messydesk for his opinion and his pics and his slab.

[coinman_23885]

yes

1880/9 S VAM 11

Uncirculated Details

Artificially Toned

 

is exactly what the label says

I was very disapointed in this one I was expecting MS64 *

 

 

 

I agree with Jom that it is one of the better looking AT coins that I have seen, and is more convincing than most. I would send it to Messy Desk, but unfortunately, I think he will confirm NGC's diagnosis.

[jom]

yes

1880/9 S VAM 11

Uncirculated Details

Artificially Toned

 

is exactly what the label says

I was very disapointed in this one I was expecting MS64 *

 

 

 

I agree with Jom that it is one of the better looking AT coins that I have seen, and is more convincing than most. I would send it to Messy Desk, but unfortunately, I think he will confirm NGC's diagnosis.

 

I can also add that if Truthteller posted it's AT, then, unfortunately, it's probably AT. He's pretty good with that stuff....

 

jom

[mumu]

What does messydesk do? Is there a website?

[mhomei]

http://www.varslab.com/

thats the link to messydesk

he slabs and does Variety atribution as well as photography

great pics too

I ALSO USE HIM FOR pcgs Submittals since I am an NGC GUY

 

THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR OPINIONS.i APPRECIATE IT

[jgrinz]

Some colors in the coin are just screaming AT ... but it is one of the better AT's

 

[James_OldeTowne]

yes

1880/9 S VAM 11

Uncirculated Details

Artificially Toned

I agree with this assessment, but I still like the coin.

[mhomei]

I just wanted to post more pics of the twin sister, and again thank you guys for your opinions and expertise

and here is the other coin I submitted with it

here are the girls side by side

 

[Coincrazed74]

Both Coins are very pretty mhomei. Especially the other one. I love the rim toning on it.

[mhomei]

thanks

they were both taken out of old american savings holders

the one on the left slabbed as ms62 ....and we already know the story on the right one...

[kryptonitecomics]

It's probable they are both NT but only the coin on the left is market acceptable. I have seen plenty of Tidy House Morgans with a similar look as your coin on the right and some grade and some bag so