looks like some ddr lincoln 'formative years' showed up ATS

[halfpint]

 

 

http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=26&threadid=723984

[gmarguli]

Sorry, but that's got to be some of the most minor and meaningless doubling I've seen since the Minnesota quarters.

[relicsncoins]

Sorry, but that's got to be some of the most minor and meaningless doubling I've seen since the Minnesota quarters.

 

I would have to agree. If I can't see the error with the naked eye and without studying the coin for 45 minutes, then it just doesn't interest me. To each his own though.

[PCcoins]

I totally disagree with the DDR. More like DDF (Double Die Finger)

[RareSov]

Well whatever is doubled, the error is technically the same as performed by mint workers.. nice find

 

I get mine today or tomorrow.. I think I'll be searching ?

[Didz]

Not much of an error if you ask me. I find stuff like that all the time. I have posted on it in the past only to find that its pretty much a worthless error. Major DD on the date would have some value.

[RareSov]

I do agree it is not worth lots of money thats for sure !! I think there will be tons of them if you look at the box dates people are pulling them from and how many they are finding

 

Makes it a slightly interesting variety.. at most. But people will buy them.. so we will see what happens

[IGWT]

Does Billy still post here?

[physics-fan3.14]

I haven't seen him post here in at least a couple of years.

Does Billy still post here?

[gmarguli]

From ATS, a crushing blow to these amazing discoveries: Peter in PCGS Customer Service told me a few minutes ago that he called Mike who does attributions for PCGS. Mike told Peter " the varieties are too insignificant to do any attributions". So today, PCGS gives the Royal Thumbs Down to this exciting new 2009 Lincoln Cent.

 

HAHAHAHAHA