ANACS Nailed this 1964 Kennedy... but what do you think? ::ANSWER REVEALED::

[braddick]

 

I'll have the full slab/answer later this afternoon!

[James_OldeTowne]

Artificial toning, to me.

[WinstonWare]

Artificial toning, to me.

 

X2

[halfpint]

[font:Courier New] [/font]

looks at to me also

[bsshog40]

Looks like alot of scratches on the slab to me. If anacs graded, then I would have to guess it graded 66 and definately looks AT'd.

[MunkyMan95]

Unc Details Artificial Toning

[SkyMan]

PR details, AT. The periphery of the reverse, if it was by itself, could be NT. The center of the reverse looks AT. The obverse is AT.

[kryptonitecomics]

AT but colorful (thumbs u

[Jeff S]

Not sure about the grade. But the image has been touched up in Paintshop or Photoshop it seems.

[TomB]

The image makes it appear to be an AT proof.

[braddick]

You guys are good! (Not a touched up photo though... Kennedy really is that colorful): Those are cardboard flecks on the slab though as this one came this week with a small grouping I sent in and I didn't wipe the slab clean.