Weidel Legacy Collection Posted October 31, 2002 Share Posted October 31, 2002 Here's the latest results of some coins I crossed-over into NGC from other holders. All of them were cracked out first and submitted as raw with a number of other raw coins: 1950 PF Dime - PCI PF65 CAM - NGC PF64 CAM 1924 Huguenot 50c - ANACS MS64 - NGC MS64 1936 Lynchburg 50c - ANACS MS63 - NGC MS63 1915-S Pan-Pac 50c - ANACS MS61 - NGC MS62 I was a little disappointed in the dime, but the Pan-Pac more than made up for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New_Horizons Posted October 31, 2002 Share Posted October 31, 2002 WOW!!! Nice trade...!!! Seems ANACS is holding up pretty well...!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoot Posted October 31, 2002 Share Posted October 31, 2002 Excellent results RWW. Congrats. I believe more and more that ANACS can legitimately compete with NGC and PCGS for grading and attributing U.S. coins. I'm not claiming that they are as good of a service, but for the most part, coins in their holders live up well to the grades assigned. My latest crossovers: 1938-S MS65 full steps Jefferson 5c ---> PCGS @ same grade/designation. 1964-D MS64 full steps Jefferson 5c ---> PCGS @ same grade/designation. Both nice coins, both 5 step nickels, both fairly rare conditionally. Hoot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithdagen Posted October 31, 2002 Share Posted October 31, 2002 Hoot, Nice crosses on both coins. I know that the 38-S is pretty rare, both FS and conditionally, and the 64-D is not well known for steps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoot Posted October 31, 2002 Share Posted October 31, 2002 Thanks Keith. Populations: 1938-S full steps: pop 4 MS65/3 MS66/ 1 MS67 1964-D full steps: pop 12 MS64/11 MS65/2 MS66 Also, Simply for high mint states, both of the above coins don't have much in the way of graded populations. I think, in part, it's a matter that many are still out raw, especially for the 1964-D, but the fact of the matter is that most of the 1938-S coins went into general circulation and nobody gave a rip about the 1964-D coins, so they also went into circulation. Also, the reverse of 1938 is quite weak, and there are very few out of SF that had full step reverses - must have been a coin press adjustment thing. (God, I sound like a hillbilly). By 1964, the Mint was still using the master hubs made in the late 1930s (the obverse made in 1938 and the reverse [of 1940] made in 1939). Most coins minted by 1964 were very bad. Hoot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weidel Legacy Collection Posted October 31, 2002 Author Share Posted October 31, 2002 Hoot - Great job on the crosses! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
