• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Broc Mitchell

Member
  • Posts

    105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Broc Mitchell

  1. On 8/7/2021 at 10:35 AM, DWLange said:

    NGC does not offer attribution by variety numbers for pre-federal American coins. These are labeled by Red Book descriptions only.

    You may occasionally find NGC-certified coins with the specific varieties, but these were done solely for certain collections, such as that of Eric P. Newman.

    I appreciate the response!

  2. I hope that it is not a problem that I take the liberty to post a coin with a slight disregard to the original rules, if its a problem I will delete the post =) Since it seems this thread has been slowly stuck on Jeffersons for the last 10 days I thought I'd shift down 100 years and post an 1838 cent:

     

    18381cOBV.jpg

     

    18381cREV.jpg

     

    Maybe this will help the ball roll a little.

     

    -Broc

  3. Russ,

     

    Its hard to tell from the pictures of course but to me they resemble dip burns which usually result when there is a contamination already on the surface which doesn't play nicely with the chemicals in your typical coin dip like jewel luster. Sometimes another dip can resolve the issue but may make it worse. If that is a consideration for you you may try neutralizing the coin first with acetone, which in itself may help remedy the situation. Another consideration is an olive oil or witch hazel soak, or just to leave it alone. If it is actively corrosive it may continue to further impair the coin. Its a rough situation if you aren't familiar with conservation, but if you are the best option is of course to fix the problem. They are both nice coins over all, I really like the 85-O.

     

    Here is seller pics of one I recently nabbed on eBay, I can't wait to see it.

     

    8456_1.JPG

     

    -Broc

  4. Here are a few pictures of the 1878-S Morgan, a little more true to life although a bit dark, the untoned area and the reverse are a nice frosty silver color. I just got two of the OTT-LITES today and the difference is already apparent, the hype is true thumbsup2.gif I just need to adjust to these over the GM bulbs I was using and get a better back drop for more accurate white balance (which is set to manual but my Nikon Coolpix still likes to fluctuate on it).

     

    1878-SOBVOTT.jpg

     

    1878-SREVOTT.jpg

     

    I tried to see if there was a VAM possiblity for this one but hit a dead end, the Denticles above AMERI on the reverse are doubled and there are very fine die polish lines on either side of the eagle's body. On the Obverse the only thing that struck me is a very fine die crack running from the point of Liberty's bust to the rim.

     

    I sure will post the results of the Half Dime when it gets back, I plan to send it and a few other coins (maybe this Morgan as well) by the middle of this week on the 12 day boat.

     

    -Broc

  5. 1861 Half Dime

     

    1861HalfDimeOBV.jpg

     

    1861HalfDimeREV.jpg

     

    How does the toning look to you all? It looks right to me but I must admit, I have been bitten before.

     

    -Broc

     

    is it a proof?

     

    I was considering this myself but I don't think it is the case. I know that some early proofs are not so proof looking, this one is so-so on the 'proofiness'. I would call it semi-prooflike, but heavily subdued due to both the toning and parallel die polish lines which are on 95% or so of both obverse and reverse fields. The reeds on the edge are very sharp and square, but the rim isn't any thicker than a circulation strike as I would expect to see (but not sure if is the case for half dimes) on a proof.

     

    The thing that seals the deal for not being proof, unless there exists a second die pair for proofs of this year, is the orientation of the dress tassel (which resides at the bottom of the main central fold just right of center) over the date. The dozen or so proofs I looked at in the Heritage gallery show that the tassel hangs about mid-line above the 6. On my coin it hangs above the right side loop of 6. I think I will send this one in to NGC eventually either way.

     

    Thank you all for your kind comments, it was one of those ones I had to snap up right away when I saw it.

     

    Keeping up on the topic of the thread, this is a Morgan I picked up at the Long Beach show this weekend. It is uncertified and 'MS-62+'. The color is a bit exaggerated in this picture but shows the full spectrum seen in hand under proper lighting:

     

    1878-SOBV.jpg

     

    My one regret that I didn't think of until well after the show is that in the album this coin came out of, right next to this coin was another 1878-S with similar toning which was football shaped instead of crescent. I think they might have puzzle-pieced together but I didn't consider it when I was looking at them! They would have been a cool pair if such was the case but alas I will never know.

     

    -Broc