• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Youngmoola

Member
  • Posts

    80
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. It's a few scratches n yea could be ..it's a very interesting looking coin to a beginner collector like myself, I know these are no major errors
  2. @neophyte numismatist indeed I knew it was the whole time copper n bronze turn a brownish color...n have a cling sound when dropped but I do apologize for confusing new comers n also responding to such nonsense..u have my word I'll be more professional..I appreciate ur true judgement 🙏🏽
  3. @ Neophyte Numismatist u right ...but honestly they make me step my game up n learn more but every new beginners may not take it lightly n take dat constructive criticism too the heart..it's sum negative ppl on here but me personally I overlook em
  4. @RWB I WILL SOON IT COME BACK FROM GETTING GRADED TIL DEN ITS NOTHING TO TALK ABOUT ON TO DA NEXT SUBJECT
  5. Do your research we all here to learn something.. it was one reported back in 2014 and one last year, I'm not saying I have the exact ones but as we all can see mines is struck on a copper planchet and the 9 has a strike to it as well if it is a nine. It's worth me sending it in just out of curiosity.
  6. There were a few unreported 89s that did got caught in the transition process at the mint. One of em was a 1989 d struck on a 1983 copper planchet reported last year.
  7. @JPM u right I overlooked the size of da numbers and it is 7 thx
  8. The 1...8...n 2 align up perfect ...if it weighs out💰🙏🏽