• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

DedKatCollections

Member
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Found this guy roll hunting; almost tossed it in the steel pile but the buildup around the righthand loop of the "D" caught my eye; didn't even realize there was an RPM error for the 1943-Ds. Any thoughts? I know it's not the strongest case but pictures 3 and 4 are identical with the exception of 3 having an exact sized box overlayed around the traced RPM.
  2. Thank you for verification on the '68-S; I tend to be in agreement on the '85-S being a mess...it simply caught my eye as strange to have the stark contract of the proof alongside....whatever the underlying reason for the toning is. $400 sounds insane! No way that will sell. Or maybe it will, once inflation catches up with their asking price enough :lol: Soooo basically, I could get some of the CAM and DCAM varieties graded but, even asking a reasonable amount, shouldn't expect any to sell at a reasonable pace?
  3. Sorry guys, maxed out the attachment size on the first one; here's the back of the 1968-S as well as the closeup of (what, in my uneducated opinion is) the S/S. Hope this is more helpful. Also, any good links on learning types and definitions of toning? I was thinking that. '85-S would be a "bullseye" on the reverse. The "cello" would be the obverse toning?
  4. I've got a stack of modern proof dimes with varying states of toning, CAM, DCAM, various minor varieties, etc. Any help on when a specimen is worth slabbing versus trying to sell raw? Heres some examples: 1985-S Proof Roosevelt Dime toned, improperly annealed, or a mix of both 1968-S Proof Roosevelt (CAM?) S/S error