Stagecoach_Rider

Thanks to EVERYONE for your valuable comments, and what a great job of outlining on the date Mike ! I am resubmitting this coin as a Variety Plus (CONECA DDO-001 [ FS-101 ]) 1942/41 D Mercury Dime

Perhaps these images, with different lighting might help. These are taken through the encasement and there is some glare. Thanks everyone !

Hi Everyone, Sadly my request for reconsideration was declined, and I will have to resubmit with the proper selection on the paperwork; at full expense. I'm told that the only note was that "it's not a mint error", and therefor was not eligible for regrading.Oh well, Lesson Learned. Again, Thanks to everyone ! I appreciate your assistance

Thanks Powermad5000, I have learned a valuable lesson with this submission. I just wish it didn't cost me so much, but Knowledge rarely comes cheap AND I am learning to be more diligent in my research / paperwork. Thanks again !

Thanks Sandon, your input is greatly appreciated. I now know the WHY it was graded as a 42-D and not a 42/41-D. My lone 74 year old brain cell needs to vibrate a bit faster, Ha Ha ! Hopefully these images are more appropriate. Thanks

Thank you for all the responses. My apologies for not including full coin images. I am including them with this reply. I submitted this coin for grading as a 42/41 D and it came back as a 42 D. I just wanted to see if my eyes were playing tricks on me or what, and to decide if I should spend more money to have it regraded. I have included the NGC image as well. Perhaps I submitted them incorrectly as Mercury 10c 1942 / 41 mint error ..... Is this incorrect ? Thanks Everyone

Can anyone tell me if this is a 1942 over 41 D mercury dime, and why or why not ? Thanks

If for instance a NGCX 9.9 is equivalent to a Sheldon Scale NGC MS69, why not allow it to be translated to MS69 so that it can be registered ? Why is a separate category even needed ?