• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Midwest Dozer

Member
  • Posts

    70
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Midwest Dozer

  1. My problem is they all ask for pictures I send them pictures and this is the reply 99% of the time. What do you do. Would you drop in the mail a coin that there’s only 22 of in the whole world. Then what say I did and it either gets lost or something happens to it that’s gone for ever. It’s amazing that both of these companies have graded these coins. We as collectors have to rely on these companies to be non biased based basically their called third party grading companies. So if they pick and choose what coins they decide can be labeled then there not a non bias based company. They are setting the market the way they want it to be. If a coin matches the only pair of dies that was used to make that coin it doesn’t matter where the coin came from mint set or Eva adams house. If they don’t want to recognize those coin then the other 22 need to be called regular Kennedy’s and not sms coins. What’s good for one is good for all that’s what makes it unbiased. One stander for all regardless. Any coin that was made with that die should be called sms otherwise it’s just a regular 1964 Kennedy. See they claim this same standard on 1893-s Morgan dollars as well only 1 obverse die and 1/2 reverse dies. We can only go by the standards they implicated in place and we have to stick to it. As what I was saying now they are picking and choosing. So there’s my thoughts about this mess. I don’t need the money he’ll I don’t even want to sell it. Now it’s more in-lines about the principal than anything. What’s really bad about all this is they all say it has to have this it has to have that it has to have a scratch here and when it all matches to a T. Then it’s a whole different story. No biased my toe.
  2. The sad part is my coin won’t grade nearly as high as any of the other ones. I see why everyone is frustrated over theses coins. They get shut down before they even get out the door.
  3. Both NGC and pgcs seem to not want slab a coin. Both companies have slabbed this attribute and have named it. If everything matches on obverse and reverse of this coin why am I missing this. Their was only one die used on the obverse of this specimen and only one die used on the reverse of this specimen. I’m confused to the road blocks I’m running into about one coin. This is extremely interesting that both companies don’t want to touch a coin
  4. No those are pictures of a 1964 sms Kennedy. I have sent NGC service all the pictures that’s been taken of this coin. I do have the others as well so no I didn’t pluck this out of some random roll or from any change. This set was in a sealed package until I noticed the Kennedy basically the 4. Then we cut them all out and took pictures of all of them. So nope not some random fake
  5. Everything matches the I the 4 everything.
  6. I’m having hell getting these pictures uploaded on here. I’m trying to crop them but save the good parts to identify it
  7. New to all of this been trying to see if he could possibly look this over
  8. So I believe this is number 29. There is 28 certified. Plus I have the penny and quarter the whole set. So I need to have these certified in person at a show so they don’t leave my sight.
  9. Compare those pictures to the second image PCGS has for coin facts about the coin even the I has the extra metal on the edge corner of the I. If you look close at the word dollar one of the L’s has some extra metal as well. Most people don’t know that cause you have to have a microscope to see it
  10. Also. The camera picked up some hint of copper in the coin well some colors. Wasn’t sure if it’s just the zoom or lighting.
  11. Just got the new camera in and got it going last night
  12. No I haven’t submitted it yet. And the six markers they mentioned is all correct except one. The finish of the coin. This looks to be stamped on a 90% silver planchette. The ones that I’ve seen on their site looks more like a clad. All of the other marks match. The markers I’m talking about being the (300) part. Well that’s the die scratching or die impressing markers. I think NGC came across one of the the same style a long time ago. I asked them for the update on that and they never sent it to me. This is a coin set you want to have graded in person. Not shipped around. Their isn’t but a few of these examples exist. So just popping them in the mail isn’t what I want to do
  13. Coin facts shows 3 examples of this alleged coin and just by die marks this coin matches in over 300 die marks or strike whatever wording you want to use. The second example or third is the ones we matched die marks off of
  14. No haven’t been told it’s fake. I have been searching proof/ms sets for years and awhile back I got in a group of sets that was unopened and weird. So I looked at the coins closer and found a 1964 Kennedy sms on a silver coin. It has the hanging Chad is what I’ve called it. It has the extra metal on the I b and most people don’t know about the extra metal on the l in dollar. Well now the cats out of the bag. I have the penny dime quarter and nickel as well. It was the set. But to check it out I opened the set to examine it closer. Also I’ve never Sean details on the edge of the rim like this either
  15. So if you have examined a coin and the die marks match at over 300 points but the coin is not on the right kind of planchette. Why wouldn’t they look at the die marks? The coin is made with the dies not the planchettes. I have pictures of all the marks and I own the set but it’s like hitting a brick wall telling people. If the coin matches so many markers,why won’t people accept the facts starring at them straight in the face. Or is the real reason is the money. Big money don’t want there high dollar coins depreciating cause there’s more than they want.