• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

alexbq2

Member
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by alexbq2

  1. Thank you all for a lively discussion!  I decided to circle back to my original question. BTW I would like to thank NGC for hosting the Registry, I think it is great! But being new to it, I have some questions, not intended to be criticism in any way. I guess I'll address them to @Ali E.. Happy Friday, no need to reply quickly...

    I was browsing some competitive date sets and the point system seems very mysterious to me. I would have thought that the point scores for each coin would be derived from the grade of the coin (higher grade = more points) and from the relative scarcity of the coin which can be determined from how many of these coins NGC graded. I expect there's also factor of value but that usually is a function grade and rarity unless it is a very popular coin.  Here's an example of two coins from consecutive years that I saw in this date set - https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/334205/

    Look at the 1907 2K on line 36. It's a very nice NGC graded MS-63BN. It's assigned Point value is 1,075. On the line above (35) the 1906 2K in MGC MS-64BN is assigned the Point Value of just 406?!  Let's look at the NGC stats for each coin.
    1907 2K MS-63:
    In MS 63 BN: 4
    In Higher Grades: 4
    Total graded by NGC: 15 in BN + 11 in RB = 26
    Points: 1,075

    1906 2K MS-64:
    In MS 64 BN: 5
    In Higher Grades: 1
    Total graded by NGC: 10 in BN + 8 in RB = 18
    Point: 406

    So it looks like a coin that is in a higher grade and is 30% scarcer got only 37% as many points...? Neither coin is remarkable in any way apart from the high grades that they hold.

  2. Thank you for trying to explain this to me. I am new to the Registry, and have just started using it for the purpose of keeping track of my collection. I can't say I understand the logic here. To me it would make sense if coins of the same type received comparable number of points. But thank you for your responses.

  3. I can't see my submission status any longer. I could see it in 'Scheduled for Grading' status last week or so, and now it's telling me - " We haven't received any submissions from you in the last 3 months ".  NGC sent me receipt confirmation on 11.18.19.  Is it broken?

     

  4. I have come into possession of a coin which the previous owner broke out of the NGC slab, probably because it had an AU Details (Cleaned) grade.  I would prefer this coin to go back to being in a slab. Do I just submit it again as a new coin, or do I give a reference to the previous NGC ID and Grade? 

    Also, I was told that NGC has a service that can improve the coin and remove the Details designation in some cases. Is this the case, and if so would that be possible to do for a "Cleaned" coin?