Tridmn

2 hours ago, VKurtB said:

What you are seeing here is a perfectly normal E greatly affected by bizarre lighting angles. There is no doubling here. 

If it were under a black light would that serve as a better way to see it then

On 5/30/2021 at 9:32 PM, Tridmn said:

Explain EVERY, AND I MEAN E V E R Y thing that is wrong with the pics I submitted. IN DETAIL

 NOT SOME HALF BUTT THING. SO, LETS GO MR BIG SHOT. 

 

EXPLAIN WHE THERE ARE 2, COUNT THEM 2 "E'S" AND NOT JUST ONE AS YOU SO BLATANTLY SAID THERE WERE NO ERRORS. LETS GO OLD MAN

Is that a better pic?

8 hours ago, Tridmn said:

You may want to check again

 

Explain EVERY, AND I MEAN E V E R Y thing that is wrong with the pics I submitted. IN DETAIL

 NOT SOME HALF BUTT THING. SO, LETS GO MR BIG SHOT. 

EXPLAIN WHE THERE ARE 2, COUNT THEM 2 "E'S" AND NOT JUST ONE AS YOU SO BLATANTLY SAID THERE WERE NO ERRORS. LETS GO OLD MAN

4 hours ago, VKurtB said:

No, it’s YOU who may want to check again, and, oh yeah, learn something about the minting process, too. You repeatedly offer up “errors which are not”.

 

Suggestion #1: Put away the USB microscope. Doing so may help with telling a quarter from a dime, for starters. 

I made a mistake, which is more than you will or can in that thick head of yours CAN'T. It is in fact a dime, however, at the time I had been looking at quarters. So it auto populated. My microscope is my best and easiest way to look at coins. It's not like I have a bionic eye ot something. Perhaps you do. Great for you. Dont sit there high and mighty like you just know "everything". I had my light as low as it would go. You want me to take better pics, then you send me the best one you can find at no charge to me. 

4 hours ago, VKurtB said:

If you are suggesting there is an error here, you are again mistaken. 

You may want to check again

4 hours ago, VKurtB said:

As usual, the Denver mint is putting out some quality circulating coins. With very little coming out of their numismatic shop, what else do they have to do?

This one isnt high quality. What else is there to say? Surely you can see what kind of quality they are putting out due to my pics. The naked eye may not see them but a microscope can.

I appreciate all the advice. I havent been on much lately due to lack of nice or coins I find interesting. 

Best I can get atm

5 hours ago, Woods020 said:

Can you post a full pic of the coin front and back? I’m curious to see if it’s circulated. 
 

I will say that dimes of recent years mintage have a ton of these issues. The dies are worn badly. You will see a lot of die chips and cracks as well. Finding a dime now without something like that it almost seems is rarer than one with something like that it seems. 

This may very well be a dime from 2020

4 hours ago, GBrad said:

Based on your pics, what I am seeing is a completely worn out die.  I can tell by the flow lines on the fields of the coin.  This signifies a worn-out die which can lead to die deterioration doubling.  It also appears to be a Dime, not a quarter....Just MHO........

It very well may be a dime considering context of pics. 

Not exactly sure what to think about this quarter. It is on obverse and reverse of the coin. Whole pieces of letters missing, some have only parts of letters missing. You can also see where it looks like doubling on almost all letters. This to me doesnt look like MD. Need some help though please and thank you 

So, not adjourned. No disrespect intended. I can get closer if need be, just took those with my phone. How else would you describe all the letters and the super clear pic. of her or eagle if it was a trick of the light?. I'm no photographer, and I dont photoshop anything I show on here. So I must disagree, it is in fact a dcam.

Couldnt add anymore pics or media to other post, so started a new thread.

2001 s sacagawea dollar. Gem, uncirculated. May not be worth what I paid, but a beautiful coin.

Just actually noticed; why does the "Y" on obverse almost look like an "X"? Trick of the light, out of focus, or just MD

2001 s sacagawea dollar. Gem, uncirculated. May not be worth what I paid, but a beautiful coin.

Just a simple couple of questions. 

What color? I say red on front and brown or maybe even red brown on obverse.

Condition? Well enough to be graded or just to hold on to?

On 2/25/2021 at 9:05 AM, VKurtB said:

Just to be sure we’re clear, replating ruins the coin’s numismatic value. 

I just figured overpolised is all. Giving it that look. They didnt make cameo then that I'm aware of due to war. So I went with best and most often find of overpolished.

I just figured overpolised is all. Giving it that look. They didnt make cameo then that I'm aware of due to war. So I went with best and most often find of overpolished.

It most definitely is steel also. Even on edges. Had to prove to myself as well it was more steel than zinc. Even the smallest magnet I felt a small pull. Larger magnet it just hung from the side.

15 hours ago, Greenstang said:

What do I think? I think it has been plated.

Show a photo of the edge to verify.

Two different sides of the penny.

1 minute ago, Tridmn said:

I do know it is just over polished,but wanted to share it anyway. I think it is a beautiful coin. What do you think?

Not enough room 

I do know it is just over polished,but wanted to share it anyway. I think it is a beautiful coin. What do you think?

I cant seem to find anything about this, can you help please?  S touching, or very close to touching 5 in date.