-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Mason254
-
Posts
216 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
NGC Journals
Gallery
Events
Store
Downloads
Posts posted by Mason254
-
-
-
-
10 hours ago, DWLange said:
That determination cannot be made without examining the coins in hand.
Thank you for the response! I would like to send them in however it would be my first time submitting a coin for grading and authentication any recommendations on the proper procedures regarding would definitely be helpful and appreciated!Thanks
-
-
-
Just now, Mason254 said:
-
-
Not sure if anyone noticed but can Can someone please explain the reeded edge??
-
-
22 hours ago, Ratzie33 said:
Unfortunately those are large dates. On the small dates the 2 is much further from the rim, and the 8 more rounded than oval. The 2 also has a prominent curve in the small dates. You’ll find one just keep looking.
It has been in circulation so therefore that 2 could have taken a hit which why the prominent curve is not there!Also all the large dates have bold lettering the 1 out of the 3 shown here does not I've yet to see a large date with sharp lettering also the mint mark are located differently on the small date when compared to a large date & the 2 is not close to the edge as in a large date however I am not being argumentative about anyones opinion and I appreciate the responses and help because I'm still learning and new to numismatics but I love it&every challenge and possibilty it brings!
-
This is going to be very interesting so...2 Large 1 Small or all Large? I've heard and have seen alot of contradictory things pertaining to the small date about the 2's,the 8's,sharp slim motto lettering the mint mark and location the 9's their points and lengths and so forth so 2 Large&1Small or All Large?
-
Ok I'm clearly not understanding this if someone would please explain a little further mechanial/strike doubling I've researched a little but apparently not enough because mechanical strike doubling has a shelf like appearance I'm not seeing the shelf like appearance in this coin the split between the 5's with the top one shifted slightly to the right clearly shows another raised 5 underneath so could someone educate me on what I'm looking at wrong thanks
-
1 hour ago, Conder101 said:
With the right chemical and/or heat pretty much any metal can "tone". This one doesn't look natural.
Thanks for the information this is the way I found the coin so it was pretty interesting being that I've never seen a coin of this year with toning
-
-
On 11/11/2019 at 8:34 AM, DWLange said:
The darkened highpoints of Monticello are typical of the wartime composition. Coining have only a relatively small proportion of silver (under 80%) tend to tone quite darkly.
Thanks
-
On 11/11/2019 at 8:31 AM, DWLange said:
That's a blend of strike doubling and die erosion doubling. There's no attributable variety.
Thank you sir!
-
On 11/19/2019 at 9:49 PM, Conder101 said:
I think you are seeing fie deterioration, and it can't be a RPM because after 1990 all the mintmarks are on the master hub they weren't punching in mintmarks any longer.
What about the toning I have not seen any coin of this year with toning besides silver
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Wire Rim?
in Newbie Coin Collecting Questions
Posted
Would this be considered a wire rim?