• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Mason254

Member
  • Posts

    216
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mason254

  1. 10 hours ago, DWLange said:

    That determination cannot be made without examining the coins in hand.

    Thank you for the response! I would like to send them in however it would be my first time submitting a coin for grading and authentication any recommendations on the proper procedures regarding would definitely be helpful and appreciated!Thanks 

  2. Just now, Mason254 said:

    I've been comparing Heritage Auction photos of 1964 SMS coins during comparison I noticed that my coins have the same die markers I do not have an expensive camera nor USB micro but in hand and while viewing with my 8x loupe it appears that its possible that my coins are also SMS? Thoughtss

    20191211_222323.jpg

     

    20191211_222443.jpg

  3. I've been comparing Heritage Auction photos of 1964 SMS coins during comparison I noticed that my coins have the same die markers I do not have an expensive camera nor USB micro but in hand and while viewing with my 8x loupe it appears that its possible that my coins are also SMS? Thoughtss

    20191211_222323.jpg

  4. 22 hours ago, Ratzie33 said:

    Unfortunately those are large dates. On the small dates the 2 is much further from the rim, and the 8 more rounded than oval. The 2 also has a prominent curve in the small dates. You’ll find one just keep looking.

     It has been in circulation so therefore that 2 could have taken a hit which why the prominent curve is not there!Also all the large dates have bold lettering the 1 out of the 3 shown here does not I've yet to see a large date with sharp lettering also the mint mark are located differently on the small date when compared to a large date & the 2 is not close to the edge as in a large date however I am not being argumentative about anyones opinion and I appreciate the responses and help because I'm still learning and new to numismatics but I love it&every challenge and possibilty it brings!

     

  5. This is going to be very interesting so...2 Large 1 Small or all Large? I've heard and have seen alot of contradictory things pertaining to the small date about the 2's,the 8's,sharp slim motto lettering  the mint mark and location the 9's their points and lengths and so forth so 2 Large&1Small or All Large?

    20191122_212919.jpg

    20191122_212946.jpg

  6. Ok I'm clearly not understanding this if someone would please explain a little further mechanial/strike doubling I've researched a little but apparently not enough because mechanical strike doubling has a shelf like appearance I'm not seeing the shelf like appearance in this coin the split between the 5's with the top one shifted slightly to the right clearly shows another raised 5 underneath so could someone educate me on what I'm looking at wrong thanks

  7. On 11/19/2019 at 9:49 PM, Conder101 said:

    I think you are seeing fie deterioration, and it can't be a RPM because after 1990 all the mintmarks are on the master hub they weren't punching in mintmarks any longer.

    What about the toning I have not seen any coin of this year with toning besides silver