jgrinz

Yep its a clunker ...

1 minute ago, Paul Hills said:

thanks JGRINZ!  i just have one more quick question, what is the bulb?  some i have seen online look like newer style bulbs...the ones you have are incandescant?? thanks again

No Fluorescent which is a little difficult to work with white balance and shadowing

but as you can see is workable. Newer ones MAY BE BETTER but the price is too. I think you can find these used for like

14 bux or so

45 minutes ago, John5123 said:

Thanks to all who have responded. Found  something that works for me . A 10000 lux light therapy lamp that mimics sunlight. The designs jump off the surface in this light.

You will find lighting in ONE direction will not be adequate … Especially proof or Proof like coins 

But good luck can wait to see your pictures

They are older ones 

Ott lights - OTL13TCG

My phone is an OLD LG G4 believe or not. 

Not really a sought after OR desired coin anomaly

This type of mint error is pretty common

You should leave this type of question on the NGC board 

Questions for NGC can be put here

Doesn't look like it anyway

3 minutes ago, Crruisercharlie said:

Thanks for your reply. Food for thought...🤔

Yes Coinbuf is correct as far as direct crossovers

Still got 2 ott lights and use them daily.

On close ups you still have a fluorescent float but otherwise still good.

Taken with 2 OTTS on either side and Picture taken in the middle with my PHONE :-)

Anything that is not securely encapsulated is a problem waiting to happen ( switch outs etc ) 

NOT considered a WORLD WIDE top tier grading service. 

"ICCS encases coins in an inert (Polyethylene Terephthalate) envelope and is then sealed in a plastic flip. The ICCS grading certificate is sealed in the other side of the flip"

Owning one of each coin - I agree with BOTH grades and outcomes.

Still desirable pieces even in Details slabs

Yeah with these pictures it looks like a VAM-11

Better pictures would help but it looks like:

Near date - O/CC high shifted left 

1 hour ago, James_OldeTowne said:

Nice RPD action going on there!

yep

3 hours ago, RWB said:

Should weigh 10 grams.

Yeah not a big difference considering the base weight of his 21 morgan which is WAY under.

ALL XF-AU in my book but all very desirable 

Nice set

25 minutes ago, GoldBear150 said:

$20.00 Lesson learned. This one caught me off guard because of the weight. Going to keep this coin in my fake coin album so i do not make a mistake like this again.

Take a real one and this one and drop on a table you will notice a distinct ring difference of the coin

Without exceptionally better pictures - Just call it a VAM-2 Large "S" Upright and centered

Date is not doubled just a break in the tone around the date

AND give it away

Silver plated pot metal

Its fake

Lot of cleaned coins there also 

Looks like your loved one enjoyed coins. 

Sorry for their passing.

On 7/31/2020 at 12:57 PM, MarkFeld said:

Bologna. 

I mean really Mark - Who says that anymore  :-)

Actually I thought you were kind of a poppycock kind a guy

Yeah that coin was hammered pretty badly not just with your 'cleaning' but also previous to you owning it.

Too bad too its a 1878 7TF '79 Rev

:-) 

Yeah I know hehe

Tried to slide one by you but I knew you would catch me 

@Ratzie33

Stop buying from James Toliver 

If its not holdered 99% of the time it cannot be.

Yes - but that's not one sorry