• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Morpheus1967

Member
  • Posts

    638
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Morpheus1967

  1. On 5/25/2016 at 12:28 PM, Ali E. said:

    Hello, grunny/CG.

     

    Thank you for your feedback and interest. The team decision that was made back in 2014 currently remains the same. We've included the Light Finish Grand Canyon for nearly six years, and there are enough examples certified by NGC to justify including it. For the Grand Canyon LF coins, we have graded 392 total, with 8 NGC graded as 70's.

     

    Due to their rarity, the Hot Springs LF SP and Yellowstone LF SP coins are not included in the NGC Competitive Registry. The NGC pop. numbers for those have not changed. Those two Light Finish varieties have only a handful of examples as NGC-graded. The Hot Springs LF only has two out of 23 total NGC graded as 70's. The Yellowstone LF has only 5 total NGC graded with the highest grade of 68. We believe that it would not be fair to make them a requirement for every participant. Thank you.

     

     

    This simply does not make any sense.  I am going to use an example I am familiar with.  You have, as part of the Niue 2016 $2 proof set, and also the 2014 Disney set, all (5) coins from the Finding Dory set.  This despite the fact that only (6) of each coin have even been graded.  Yet you keep these in the respective sets I just named?  I have no issue with it, just curious where you draw the line?  Thanks.  

     

     

    Capture.PNG