• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

EleMint Man

Member
  • Posts

    155
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by EleMint Man

  1.  

    So you are assigning a grade to the singular element of strike, which happens to coincide with the 70 scale used to do determine overall grade based mostly on wear, of which strike is a singular of many elements of? Is that correct?

     

    I am just pointing out that while that may work for you own selection of coin, and there would be nothing wrong with that as I too value strike heavily in liking a coin, it has very little real world impact on grade, and as in the case of with the owner of the most expensive coin ever sold "the strike doesn't matter one bit".

     

    Not to mention the fact that neither of those two AU coins, nor the MS64 coin's assigned grade had anything to do with strike.... that first one is a great looking, weakly struck MS coin, which is why it is limited at 64. Those other two were coins that had been slightly circulated... if you can't see that, I would practice up on your grading skills.

     

     

    Being that I started learning how to grade last summer, I'm told I'm not half bad

    at grading by seasoned dealers. In fact, I'm asked about my opinion on new material they acquire. Heck, your never too old to learn more!

     

    After much ruminating on the remarks on this thread, I have found the Holy Grail of

    Roosevelt's "Just For Fun's" identical twin for a fraction of the price tag. Enjoy!

     

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/1947-D-Roosevelt-Dime-Monster-Gem-BU-Full-Band-Awesome-Toning-/121830427772?hash=item1c5da8cc7c :whee:

     

  2. Now, I am convinced that I am missing something. What am I missing? Am I really this oblivious to the series? The hits on the reverse would preclude a anything above a 65 for me.

     

    Offered here is THE nicest 1964-D Roosevelt Dime ever graded at PCGS in their near 30 year existence as the TOP grading service!! A pop 1/0 coin...!

     

    The state of preservation of this dime (especially the obverse) is utterly amazing. Bear in mind, this coin was graded PCGS-MS68FB a long time ago and any suggestion of "recent gradeflation" simply does not apply to this coin that has been in this holder for a long, long time!! ...

     

    I am on PCGS' prestigious "Board of Experts" having been hand picked as PCGS' top (outside) modern coin expert at the time.

     

    After looking at some MS68 on HA, this coin appears to have similar strike details. The

    hits are probably offset by the toning from the graders stand point. I've seen coins that

    appeared two grades lower strike wise than what the holder listed and was told by

    fellow collectors the grade was assigned primary for the eye appea.l RWB recently

    called grading a "Pseudo Science". I like to think there is happy median in which

    collectors can agree on the quality of the coin!

     

    Are you still under the impression that strike has anything to do with wear? [/quote

     

    I'm not under the impression strike determines the grade these days, in the beginning yes! Overall eye appeal is paramount to a "Proper" grade imho.

     

    This Morgan is a good example of how toning and eye appeal override strike

    which looks AU53 to me.

     

    http://coins.ha.com/itm/morgan-dollars/a/131619-23851.s?ic3=ViewItem-Auction-Open-BrowseThisAuction-120115#

  3. Now, I am convinced that I am missing something. What am I missing? Am I really this oblivious to the series? The hits on the reverse would preclude a anything above a 65 for me.

     

    Offered here is THE nicest 1964-D Roosevelt Dime ever graded at PCGS in their near 30 year existence as the TOP grading service!! A pop 1/0 coin...!

     

    The state of preservation of this dime (especially the obverse) is utterly amazing. Bear in mind, this coin was graded PCGS-MS68FB a long time ago and any suggestion of "recent gradeflation" simply does not apply to this coin that has been in this holder for a long, long time!! ...

     

    I am on PCGS' prestigious "Board of Experts" having been hand picked as PCGS' top (outside) modern coin expert at the time.

     

    After looking at some MS68 on HA, this coin appears to have similar strike details. The

    hits are probably offset by the toning from the graders stand point. I've seen coins that

    appeared two grades lower strike wise than what the holder listed and was told by

    fellow collectors the grade was assigned primary for the eye appea.l RWB recently

    called grading a "Pseudo Science". I like to think there is happy median in which

    collectors can agree on the quality of the coin!