James_OldeTowne

AU-53.

It's what some call classic "shelf doubling", I believe.

Nothing regarding certification would add value to this very ordinary quarter.

And I agree as well - if you are asking whether certification would be financially beneficial, then no way is that the case.

Most definitely "BN".  A brown-designated cent can retain a considerable amount of original mint red color, yet still not qualify as "RB".

The pics don't show anything unusual that I can see.

There are better-crafted explanations already posted.  Basically, it looks to me like the dies were too far apart when the coin was struck, or the planchet was a little too thin.  At any rate, the net striking pressure wasn't adequate to strike out the as-made striations.

I agree with the prior post - sharpness of "fine".  It's tough to decipher whether it's been cleaned or altered, though.

Here is a 1969-B $20 bill with a somewhat comparable backstory from 1973, except that it did receive a reply from the Department of the Treasury - enjoy.

"CC" = "counterfeit coin" ?? 

Getting it certified will almost certainly add nothing to the sentimental value, if your intent is to pass it down.  A 2x2 holder would be much cheaper and more interesting, especially as you could write something personal on the holder.  The coin appears to grade something like MS-62 if I am interpreting the photos correctly.

I agree with what was previously stated.  There appears to be residue adhering to the coin.

These photos show no discernible evidence of any kind of special finish.

That kind of toning spot is commonly seen and only detracts from the value of a typical coin.  A classic situation is when a coin is in a 2x2 or flip, and a tiny hole permits air to enter, creating just such a distraction.

Numerous circumstances could create that look, none of which add value or numismatic interest.

I see nothing notable based only on the photos.

16x face.

It's worth about 16 times face due to silver content.

Going only by the photos, I would not spend money to certify this dollar.

It appears to be polished or even whizzed, but it's a genuine example.  This is perfect for use as a pocket piece!

My only contribution is to agree that it is a Tibet, 1-sho.  One doesn't see these very often.

Those are really excellent photos!  I'm jealous!

Given that these can still be found in pocket change, it's true value is 1-cent.  However, numismatically, wholesale/retail is something like 1.5 cents to what Conder quoted.

17 hours ago, RWB said:

The US Mint normally made arrangements for persons connected with a new coin, or who had a compelling interest in new coins, to purchase examples. This could be done during initial annual production (as with the Director or Sec Treasury), or at a formal ceremonial striking as with the Kennedy halves. There was, and is, nothing illegal or under-the-table about this - it is a common courtesy.  A similar situation was offered Denver Mint employees at first release of 1964-D halves - each could buy 2 new halves on the first release date. Philadelphia Mint did the same, and a bag was delivered to Treasury for a similar purpose. Smithsonian got coins from new dies in a similar manner whether direct from each mint for via the Director's office.

Roger, just out of curiosity, how does that come into play with regard to the 1964 Peace dollar?

Others will rank the provenance differently than I would, but Newman stands head and shoulders above the rest for his astonishing contributions to the hobby. What did Eliasberg really contribute to the hobby we know today?  He got an example of every coin and then was done.  Newman contributed to my enjoyment across a lifetime.