WLH update! Can you help grade and decide AT or NT ??

[bsshog40]

I hope ya'll remeber the WLH that I got off ebay a week ago for $10. I had some mixed reactions about it and now I have it in hand. Had to take 2 different pics. The first 2 are straight on and the last is an angled so a better idea of the toning might be percieved. I can't tell NT from AT so your help is appreciated. Also, could you help me with a grade? thanks all!!

[jesbroken]

Appears NT to me Bobby, and I'm not a WLH person so my grade won't mean much, but I'll attempt it. I would grade this coin EF45. Hope I'm wrong and its higher. It is a nice Walker.

[MunkyMan95]

Still AT

[drwstr123]

It has the natural progression of colors for a toning silver item. As to whether it was done intentionally, I don't have any wat to tell. Mike (I've recently toned a ASE in similar colors)

[construct]

I believe it's NT. I think I'd grade it in the AU range because I'm seeing quite a bit of luster. It looks pretty clean. Maybe a 55.

[bsshog40]

I believe it's NT. I think I'd grade it in the AU range because I'm seeing quite a bit of luster. It looks pretty clean. Maybe a 55.

It has plenty of luster to it.

[rrantique]

I believe it to be NT Bobby and i would venture Au-50 -55 i like it

[nwcs]

Looks real but those surfaces are a concern.

[bsshog40]

Still AT

 

Chad, what makes you think this is AT? What gives that away? The seller said he thought it was album toned. Now remember, I don't know how to tell either way, but looking at the coin in hand, the Obv is real dark blue around the rim, then spreads out to the reddish and goldish colors. The Rev. is light around the rim with a mixture of blue,green, red and gold, and then spreads out to the green, reds, and goldish colors all across the eagle. Just more description for ya to verify either way.

[MunkyMan95]

The colors just look too pastel to be real, IMO.

[bsshog40]

The colors just look too pastel to be real, IMO.

 

That's the kind of responses I'm looking for Chad cuase I couldn't tell ya one way or the other . thanks!

 

BTW, ya ain't gonna help grade it?

[zrlevin]

It looks AT to me, and I'll tell ya why.

 

The colors are overlayed on top of the devices. Usually, the toning will go around them causing the color on the devices and the fields surrounding will be different, but this is not the case here.

 

The colors are also off. I have never seen these colors on a .900 silver coin, although I have seen them on a .999 SAE.

[Bruceswar]

From the pictures I cannot tell weather it is AT or NT. Bobbt bring that one with you to the TNA, and I will offer an opinion!

[bsshog40]

From the pictures I cannot tell weather it is AT or NT. Bobbt bring that one with you to the TNA, and I will offer an opinion!

 

Thought I would, got it next to my franklin!

[SkyMan]

It's a pretty coin and for $10 I'd buy it. IMO though it is AT.

[michael]

au

ugly

 

and highly questionable non-market acceptable toning

[MunkyMan95]

au

ugly

 

and highly questionable non-market acceptable toning

 

 

Michael tells it like it is!!

[TJ'S Coins]

I really like this one Bobby, especially at the price.

[bsshog40]

Thanks TJ

[MikeInFL]

Looks questionable to me. The coin is attractive, so at the right price I would consider it -- and at $10 you can't really go wrong...Mike