leeg Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Very Nice Bob!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dean1345 Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 (edited) Bob those are some wild colors on your 42' proof. Edited March 30, 2009 by dean1345 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeKing Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Nice coin...but it's neither a 25c or a 1945.....can someone please get us back on track..... duh sorry, wrong post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
physics-fan3.14 Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Bob, you need to warn us to put sunglasses on before you show something like that! Wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robec1347 Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Bob those are some wild colors on your 42' proof. Bob, you need to warn us to put sunglasses on before you show something like that! Wow I know those aren't everyone's cup of tea, but in hand they are not quite as blatant and bright. When moving them in the light they look like little pieces of multi colored glass or enamel. If anyone has any that they are burdened with, I'll be happy to take them off your hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dooly Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Something a bit more up to date .. ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
physics-fan3.14 Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 To get us back on track - how about a few error pennies? These are all 1957D, the first one is a die break, the second one is a very long, large die crack, and the third one is a nice lamination. Sorry about the tiny pictures, these are very, very old pictures from a scanner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lehigh96 Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartlesvilleok Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 Here is another "cent" or maybe I should say an almost cent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
physics-fan3.14 Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 At first I thought you posted a three center, and I was gonna say that's outta line. Then I saw what it really is, and now I'm gonna say no fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartlesvilleok Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 At first I thought you posted a three center, and I was gonna say that's outta line. Then I saw what it really is, and now I'm gonna say no fair. , whats no fair about it? It is a 1 cent, Its a pattern, It has the obverse of a 3 cent. I was trying to make it easy for the next person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
physics-fan3.14 Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 Haha, I'm just teasing of course. Its a very nice pattern, a very interesting type. You just don't see them very often - it took me by surprise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishfinder Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 (edited) great lookin pattern we on what date? Edited March 31, 2009 by fishfinder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartlesvilleok Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 It is a 1868 so I would think that for the next coin you could have the following, 1 cent pattern obverse of a 3 cent 1868 roman numeral agricultural wreath made of nickel also the same size as a dime I belive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ldhair Posted March 31, 2009 Author Share Posted March 31, 2009 As much as I love it, it's not the correct type or date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robec1347 Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 Very nice Larry!! Never tired looking at those. (thumbs u Here is one of Richard Shapiro's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartlesvilleok Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 As much as I love it, it's not the correct type or date. Hum a one cent is not the same as a one cent. I am sorry I made that mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
physics-fan3.14 Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 As much as I love it, it's not the correct type or date. Hum a one cent is not the same as a one cent. I am sorry I made that mistake. I think we are supposed to stay within series - thus while its lincoln's we aren't supposed to post a large cent. I think its supposed to be same series or same year, not same denomination. Don't worry, no problems, no hurt feelings. Its a nice coin regardless of where it fits in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Bob Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 As much as I love it, it's not the correct type or date. Hum a one cent is not the same as a one cent. I am sorry I made that mistake. I think we are supposed to stay within series - thus while its lincoln's we aren't supposed to post a large cent. I think its supposed to be same series or same year, not same denomination. Don't worry, no problems, no hurt feelings. Its a nice coin regardless of where it fits in the game. Patterns ought to be considered wild cards. (wild coins?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ldhair Posted April 1, 2009 Author Share Posted April 1, 2009 In my opinion the guy that started this thread years back had probably been drinking at the time. He set up only Commemoratives as wild if they joined in by date and that let you post any Comm. or any date on the coin. He never thought of patterns and thats just wrong. I would think if it joined in by date it would be wild. That would let you post any pattern or any coin of that date or denomination. I'll go slap the guy that started the thread if he won't agree. Getting to the pattern that was posted would be really easy. I can't find the images to make it work but a 1909 Lincoln could go to a 1909 IHC to a 1868 IHC to the 1868 pattern. I'll start it. We need a 1909 Indian cent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robec1347 Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Bob Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 In my opinion the guy that started this thread years back had probably been drinking at the time... I'll go slap the guy that started the thread if he won't agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robec1347 Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Now we're ready for patterns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ldhair Posted April 1, 2009 Author Share Posted April 1, 2009 (edited) Here you go Bartlesvilleok and thanks Bob for the help. Edited April 1, 2009 by ldhair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinstonWare Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOILER78 Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 And here is a Wildcard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ldhair Posted April 1, 2009 Author Share Posted April 1, 2009 That set gets the Wild award Boiler. So cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Bob Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 And here is a Wildcard I have died and gone to numismatic heaven. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robec1347 Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 And here is a Wildcard Now that's just sick!!! Incredible!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartlesvilleok Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 And here is a Wildcard wow that is an awesome set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
