Strike Through Error? 1 1

[Walter Holmes]

I picked up this 1887-CC Morgan $ graded MS 64. The reverse seems to have a strike through error. Can anyone confirm, error coins aren’t my area. Thanks. 

[Walter Holmes]

[Coinbuf]

On 6/29/2024 at 8:14 AM, Walter Holmes said:

I picked up this 1887-CC Morgan $ graded MS 64. The reverse seems to have a strike through error. Can anyone confirm, error coins aren’t my area. Thanks. 

 

The Carson City mint didn't strike dollars in 1887, if your coin is dated 1887 it is a counterfeit, which I doubt NGC would have missed. 

I only see damage from a scratch or bag hit.

[Walter Holmes]

On 6/29/2024 at 11:29 AM, Coinbuf said:

The Carson City mint didn't strike dollars in 1887, if your coin is dated 1887 it is a counterfeit, which I doubt NGC would have missed. 

I only see damage from a scratch or bag hit.

Sorry typo. 1882

[RWB]

Very generous "grade." Consider the coin not the label.

[Greenstang]

Hard to tell because of the reflection in that area but I would be more inclined towards damage than a Struck Through.   
Perhaps a closeup of that area might help.

[Henri Charriere]

On 6/29/2024 at 3:32 PM, RWB said:

Very generous "grade." Consider the coin not the label.

This is a refrain (coin, not label) often heard on this Forum. (One member boasts he will never become a slave to any label.) (Another says, Buy the book before the coin.)  Yet others are partial to the guiding philosophy of an upstart:  CACG. Needless to say, if a seller is partial to a particular label, there must be a reason. THE ONLY MEMBER THAT HAS CONSISTENTLY PUSHED FOR SOME SEMBLANCE OF STANDARDS IS DISMISSED WITH EXPLETIVES AND RUN OUT OF TOWN ON A RAIL!  And, all the controversy seems to be centered on 12 of the 70 grades on a scale. Mah-ve-lous!

[powermad5000]

I would need to see at a minimum cropped photos of both sides of the coin. I don't need to see the whole NGC holder.

@Walter Holmes, could you please post cropped images of both sides of just the coin, not the holder?