1964 P Washington Quarter - MS, MSPL, PR? 0

[SPedigo]

I purchased this coin to add to a set of 1956-1964 Type B reverse, but I have been told that this is a proof.  However, I think it's possible that this could be designated as MSPL.  I want to submit it, but am worried that it will come back as a standard proof coin.  I can find no resources on line that help with determining the correct designation myself.  I could use some guidance on this.

[NickiO CS]

Hello @SPedigo,

Thank you for reaching out to us. Thank you for sharing the beautiful photos. Unfortunately, I cannot confirm PF or MSPL designations with photographs. An in-hand evaluation by the grading team would be required to determine whether the coin would be attributed PF or MSPL. 

If you have any other questions, please let us know. 

Regards, 

[SPedigo]

Thank you

[Sandon]

   Your coin appears to be a proof. A proof-like circulation strike wouldn't have such a "watery" appearance or the light contrast on the devices.  The complete absence of bag-marks and other lack of evidence of contact with other coins or objects also indicates that the coin originated in a proof set.

[Coinbuf]

Looks to be a proof coin to my eyes as well.   I would not suggest you attempt a submission in the hopes of getting a PL MS grade, but it's your decision.

[VKurtB]

Yup. A proof. Nobody from NGC will ever offer an opinion that negatively impacts revenue. We, as independent collectors, can and do. 

[Fenntucky Mike]

It's a proof and not enough contrast for a cameo designation. Not worth having graded IMO.

[SPedigo]

Thanks to everyone that chimed in on this question.  I am in agreement that this is not submission worthy and will go back into my collection until another day.