1942/1d PREVIOUSLY SENT FOR REVIEW 1 1

[Derek Bentley]

1942/1 d ........ Maybe this time you can see it.

[Fenntucky Mike]

Nope, can't see it.

[Just Bob]

Your coin does appear to have some doubling - possibly strike doubling - of the date, but it does not look like the overdate. If it does not match the picture below exactly, it is not the 42/1 D.

 

[Derek Bentley]

It also has the markings on the opposite side to further authenicate. Physically the only way it couldn't be is if the date was missing.

[Derek Bentley]

The disappointment was the fact a shipping receiving manager before opening called to tell it wasnt. Not a grader. So the $150 it cost 90 with return shipping. After I said something I lost the remaining $60 credit. BAD BUSINESS

[tj96]

I only see this.

 

[Just Bob]

Unless you can show a better picture, I am going to have to disagree. The picture that you are showing does not match the picture that I posted. 

[Coinbuf]

Looks to me that you got the correct answer, paid a ton of money for it, but got it.   Your photos only show a normal dime with some extreme strike doubling.

Edited February 12, 2022 by Coinbuf