Fadi Assaf Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkFeld Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Both are counterfeit and have no numismatic value. Also, a little bit of research would have shown you that genuine Trade Dollars weren’t made until 1873. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirt Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Sorry to say, you've got fakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VKurtB Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 19 hours ago, MarkFeld said: a little bit of research would have shown you Haven't you heard, Mark? This newer generation of collectors doesn't do "research" any more; they ask questions on forums. "That's what we're here for", right? /sarcasm alert Morpheus1967 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VKurtB Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 Also, this poster has now shown us nothing but counterfeit coins, of several denominations. Could he be "test marketing" them? Inquiring minds want to know. Henri Charriere 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voltyris Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 (edited) 21 hours ago, MarkFeld said: Both are counterfeit and have no numismatic value. Also, a little bit of research would have shown you that genuine Trade Dollars weren’t made until 1873. How dare you blame him for failing to conduct research about a coin's date? If the ones who made the counterfeit failed to do so : ) Edited March 3, 2020 by AtlantisCollections Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kbbpll Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 But isn't the 1791 a perfectly legal "fantasy" coin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWB Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 On 3/3/2020 at 6:57 PM, kbbpll said: But isn't the 1791 a perfectly legal "fantasy" coin? No. It is a counterfeit. It has the correct issuing authority and denomination. Nothing else is required for classification as a counterfeit. A "fantasy" piece will lack one or both of the above - OR - have the HPA required "COPY" stamp on one face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kbbpll Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 14 minutes ago, RWB said: No. It is a counterfeit. It has the correct issuing authority and denomination. Nothing else is required for classification as a counterfeit. A "fantasy" piece will lack one or both of the above - OR - have the HPA required "COPY" stamp on one face. Sorry, I was just stirring the pot. I shouldn't do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWB Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 18 hours ago, kbbpll said: Sorry, I was just stirring the pot. I shouldn't do that. That's good. Can't make a good stew without a little stirring. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
