error? 1928 or 1938

[Hurley61]

[Just Bob]

That is a "2." The "3" looks totally different.

link to a picture of a 1938 Lincoln here

[Greenstang]

I agree, it is a 1928. Too bad about the damage.

[JKK]

Looks like the same gouge that took out the bottom of the 9 also messed up the bottom of the 2. Bummer.

[Hurley61]

Thank for your help can I ask what would cause the damange . My grandpa had this roll in a coin wrapper , but honestly I don't know how long

[Greenstang]

Hard to say exactly what happened unless you were there at the time.

The date has taken a hit from something that has destroyed the bottom of the numbers. Also the top of the 1 is damaged.

[Hurley61]

Thank you sir

[Mohawk]

I also vote damaged 1928.