Four more 1896 Morgan Dollars if you have time to look

[bahany]

Below are 4 additional 1896 Morgan Dollars that I have acquired. How do you think they would grade? What about the one with one side toned and the other not (it was the end coin on a roll). This one also has a defect on the obverse. It was in the roll up against #3(similar defect on the reverse of that coin). Still trying to figure out how to photograph these. Read online suggestions for photographing them but still have a way to go.

 

Thanks in advance - just getting into this and trying to learn from you.

 

 

#1

 

 

#2

 

 

#3

 

 

#4

 

[bahany]

Also took a picture with different lighting and black background:

 

Shocked at how different the coins look under this lighting with the black background:

 

The reverse is slightly out of focus:

 

For comparison, I took a picture of a Mexican coin that I know is pretty good:

 

 

And a 1921 Morgan:

 

 

 

[clarkbar04]

1. 62

2. 63 - assuming that is a strike-through error and not a big scratch - looks odd to be a scratch.

3. 64

4. 64

 

1896 is a super common date and probably not worth grading fees until you hit the gem level, but there is nothing wrong with enjoying raw coins.

[KMAG100]

I'll go 62, 62, 63, 64 and a 64 on your Cien Pesos

[bahany]

Thanks again.

 

I think I am getting a little better on estimating these based on your responses. I compared them to the photograde site and I had thought they were around 63 and thought that the Cien Peso was about a 65.

 

 

[KMAG100]

I could see the Cien Pesos in a 65 holder. I thought the obverse was easy 65, however the reverse I thought the fields had too many hits to be 65 along with the coat line, cheek, and forehead. But I don't get paid to grade so I could be easily wrong.

[Raisethis2]

I find the four Morgans to all be in the MS 63 range.

[grip]

All the MD's look about 63.