• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CC GSA Bodybag

21 posts in this topic

Got a pile of GSA CC Morgans back from our hosts. One of them came back in a body bag, marked obverse improperly cleaned. My natural response was simply, "wut?" Then I looked at the coin and saw what looked like a wheel mark -- a skid left from a rubber wheel on a counting machine -- on the obverse. Then I looked into the GSA CC sale preparation notes in the VAM book and saw that for a short time, they were using a mechanical sorting device, which was abandoned in favor of gloved women after it was discovered it could mark up the coins. Anyone else have experience with bodybagged GSAs, any idea how often this occurs, or more details on the device in question and how long it was used?

 

Picture this evening, perhaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John, it also makes me wonder if any of the employees involved in the sorting and packaging of the CC's didn't try to clean some of them hoping to improve the classification (UNC/CIRC).

 

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are several of these floating around. They all came from the mixed category and were not sold by GSA as "uncirculated."

 

There is a large file on this at NARA, if anyone cares to sort the reality from hype and assumption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I'm interested in knowing is the nature of the automated sorting mechanism eluded to in the VAM book, and if it is indeed the source of the wheel marks. I'll have to look at the coin later to see what kind of GSA holder it's in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was just a motor operated coin counter with a rubber friction wheel that touched the coins. Small coins were OK, but the dollars got scraped because of their weight and slow movement.

 

Circulated dollars are occasionally found with these marks, but most that went through the counting machines in earlier times were melted as defective, underweight and mutilated coins.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting information, guys. John, that 65+ is toned, isn't it? Reason I say (and, this is just a theory I have), those are the ones that mostly ended up in the "Silver Dollar" holders for the reason tarnish was conceived of less-favorably, then, even, by many, as environmental damage. That, in turn, explains why so much silver was dipped, and why mostly the "white" CCs are the ones that ended up in the "Uncirculated Silver Dollar" holders. In fact, if I'm right about that 65+, it means it was a dip away from making an "Uncirculated Silver Dollar" holder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kurtdog - Yep, right on the $$$. Tarnished coins were inferior - especially since a lot of the tarnish was irregular and not very attractive. But, there were exceptions that ended up in the "cheap" holders that now are not cheap coins.

 

(If we posit that the canvas bag has a role in promoting toning, and that it also has a role in reducing surface damage to a coin that is pressed and held against the bag, then some of the best condition GSA coins are also likely toned, and therefore more likely to be in the "Silver Dollar" GSA holders.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spoke with one dealer who personally cracked hundreds of CC GSAs out of those holders, possibly for the quick dip and regrade or before the grading services offered to put that strip around the GSA holder with a grade.

 

BTW, a dealer showed me how the Bluesheet has pricing listed on the GSA CCs, don't look to GS for pricing on dates like 1890 or 1891 CC as they are worth quite a bit more in the now rare GSAs for those better dates. Also only one 89CC apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The '89-CC is a soft pack, isn't it?

 

EDIT: or was that found in a mixed bag and put into one of the generic "Silver Dollar" holders? Can't remember.

 

I'm not sure but it is worth a ton as the only one.

 

Bluesheet shows over $2K for 1890 and 1891CC GSAs, many multiples of CDN unc. money. So sharp dealers can whip out the GS and show what the "bids" are for "certified" cc Morgans and then flip them at huge profits. A little like how dealers can buy rare varieties at generic money to real profit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 1889-CC is in a hard case. Monaco had it a few years ago, and they still may, for all I know. It's cool being the only one known, but it's not terribly attractive. I think it's a 62PL, and has a price tag commensurate with it being the only GSA 89-CC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 89-cc is in a hard pack and is graded ms-62 dmpl and is owned by Doug Sharpe of Florida. There is a possibility that there are other owners. Doug told me he had the coin insured for 1/2 million dollars when we spoke. By the way, I think DMPl is very generous. The coin is no more than PL IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it "far worse than a body bag"? As to why it is designated as it is, it was originally in a GSA softpack holder (Sold by the GSA for $3 each. While the softpacks were to be used for the obviously circulated coins, for some reason a LOT of the MS 1878 CC dollars went out in these holders) The person who submitted it wanted it slabbed in a regular NGC slab and not in the holder they normally used for holdering the softpacks. They also wanted it identified by the VAM number probably because he knew it was one of the top 100 VAM's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can and should leave them in OGP/GSA packaging. That said, I'm a certified GSA "nut" so I will explain no more on my opinion. The GSA soft pack holders acknowledge every thing a NGC slab does.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites