• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Time to Eat Crow

8 posts in this topic

In light of a document I recently discovered, I must amend a journal I wrote nearly three years ago.


On November 27, 2011 I wrote the Journal entry entitled "Obverse or Reverse?" (http://coins.www.collectors-society.com/JournalDetail.aspx?JournalEntryID=9876) in which I came to the conclusion that contrary to conventional wisdom, the shield/date side of the coins in the US/Philippine series should be designated as the obverse and the figure/denomination side should be the reverse. This was a reasonable conclusion given the Allen catalog and other documents and resources available to me at the time. Unfortunately, it was not the correct conclusion.


While doing research for a completely different (and as yet unwritten) journal entry, I came across a document that was not available to me in November 2011. Google has digitized an amazing number of obscure documents, and sometime after I wrote my previous journal entry they digitized the one that contains the definitive information I wish I had had in 2011.


Document No. 144 of the 58th Congress, 2nd Session of the House of Representatives entitled "Stability of International Exchange" was published on December 17, 1903 and is a massive tome of 523 pages. It is essentially a 36 page report authored by Hugh H. Hanna, Charles A. Conant, and Jeremiah W. Jenks on establishing a fixed relationship between the moneys of the gold-standard countries, and the silver based countries of the day. The remainder is just supporting documentation divided into 14 separate appendices. Buried deep in Appendix J, on page 414 is a section entitled "The Execution of the Philippine Coinage Act." which is itself an excerpt from a report prepared by Col. Clarence R. Edwards, Chief of the Bureau of Insular Affairs.


From my previous journal, The Philippine Coinage act of 1902, states in "Sec. 82. That the subsidiary and minor coinage hereinbefore authorized shall bear devices and inscriptions to be prescribed by the government of the Philippine Islands and such devices and inscriptions shall express the sovereignty of the United States, that it is a coin of the Islands, the denomination of the coin, and the year of the coinage."


The remainder of this journal contains the words of Col. Edwards concerning the execution of Sec. 82 with respect to the design elements of the US/Philippine coinage:


VI.--The Execution Of The Philippine Coinage Act.


In anticipation of legislation providing for a special coinage system for the Philippine Islands, the Philippine Commission, in December, 1901, adopted a resolution appointing Commissioners T. H. Pardo de Tavera and Benito Legarda a special committee to confer with competent persons and obtain suggestions and designs from native artists, if possible, for the Philippine coins. The report of this committee, including photographic designs, was forwarded to this Bureau by the civil governor of the Philippine Islands soon after the appointment of said committee, and was retained here pending Congressional action. Among the same were designs by Mr. Melecio Figueroa, of Manila, who had taken a prize at a competitive examination in Madrid and who had studied art in Rome, which were preferred by the Secretary of War and officials of this Bureau, and which may be described as follows:


There were two Figueroa designs for the obverse, to express "that it is a coin of the Philippine Islands," one for the silver and the other for the nickel and copper coins, and one design only for the reverse, to "express the sovereignty of the United States," the latter a shield surmounted with an eagle with outstretched wings, unmistakably American, and at the same time so different from the devices on the United States silver dollar, fifty-cent piece, and quarter as not to be easily confounded. This device is surrounded by the legend "United States of America. 1903."


The first of the obverse designs is the entire figure of a Filipino woman lightly clothed in loose costume, with tresses floating in the wind. She holds in her right hand a hammer which rests on an anvil. In the background is seen the Mayon volcano, a perfect cone, therefore typical in that none other of such symmetry exists. The legend for the peso, surrounding the figure, being, "One peso Filipinas."


The other obverse design substitutes for the female figure as described the figure of a man seated by an anvil, with one elbow resting thereon, and grasping a hammer in the right hand, while the left rests on the left knee. Both figures are well proportioned, the pose natural and graceful, and the figures well modeled. The design conveys the thought that it is by earnest labor that the Filipinos must work out their destiny, under the guidance of the United States.




On December 18, 1902, the Philippine Commission prescribed the Figueroa obverse design of the native woman for all the silver pieces and the other obverse design of the sitting Filipino for the copper pieces, the reverse being common to all.


The final act of Congress--Philippine coinage system--was passed March 2, 1903. On March 7 the Secretary of the Treasury submitted for inspection and approval a specimen of the new peso coin for the Philippine Islands.



See more journals by coin928

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A knowledgeable correction is never "eating crow." It might really be the opposite...


Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no eating crow if you discover new information you did not have available to you just a few years ago. As you know I've researched the origins of many of my coins and made conclusions based on the information I had. Should I discover additional information and dare I say contrary information I will do as you have done and be glad that I have a more accurate account of the origins of my coins.


Your post is excellent and it sheds more light on the Philippine coins I own. Thus we all benefit from more accurate information.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys,


It wouldn't be so bad if it was just the one journal. Oh no, it's in every one of my USPI coin descriptions, coin images, and a few set descriptions. I haven't actually counted, but I think that's over 200 pictures that have to be swapped, and descriptions that need to be reviewed.

This is going to take a while. doh!


BTW, If anyone is interested in reading the original document, here are three links:

Note that all three links above just refer to different sections in the same Google digitized document.


There's a lot of interesting information in Appendix J that may interest other US/Philippine collectors. For example, coins minted in San Francisco made their way to the Philippines virtually free of charge via military transport ship. No big surprise there, but coins minted in Philadelphia were shipped by commercial steamship sailing from New York through the Suez Canal to the Philippines. This method was less expensive than the cost of express train shipment from Philadelphia to San Francisco! It's no wonder that production of all US/Philippine coinage was shifted to San Francisco in 1908.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are extensive archive files regarding the Philippines in NARA College Park, MD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



I saw this resource on the web, but is this information readily available to people who are not physically located in Maryland?



Link to comment
Share on other sites



Look on the bright side - it sounds to me like you've discovered something that was previously not known to the the numismatic community and you can now demonstrate that the conventional wisdom isn't just conventional wisdom anymore, but is, in fact, the truth of the matter.


Perhaps this is worth an article in The Numismatist or, an article in the journal of US-PI coin collectors (if there is such a club), or, if those two don't work out, Wayne Homren is always happy to publish something like this in the The E-Sylum.


It sounds like a good thing to me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. You have to go to NARA in College Park to see the files. There are hundreds of thousands of pages.


Most NARA materials are only available for in-person research. (NARA includes trillions of pages of documents and records, plus photos, film, tapes, etc.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites