3 Cent Nickel Grade?

[Bruceswar]

I will hold my thoughts on this one. What are yours?

 

[physics-fan3.14]

I vote EF with a terrible strike.

[Coindude]

Looks like one of those AU 62 coins, looks to have a weak strike. But the toning could be throwing me off. Looks to have thick skin.

 

On second look , it appears to have rub in the hair, but it could be weak strike, most likely XF45'ish.

[James_OldeTowne]

Wow, what a wonderful LDS!! It's a solid AU-55 from what I can see, although the reverse might suffer from environmental damage.

 

This coin's a hands-down keeper!

[relicsncoins]

Technically, I think the coin is unc. just weakly struck. I think this is what the MS60 grade was created for. If that is pitting/corrosion of the reverse, it would concern me though. If it's just dark toning then it should grade.

[C.I.]

Well used die might be an overstatement. XF.

 

Chet

[cameron12x]

Wow, what a wonderful LDS!! It's a solid AU-55 from what I can see, although the reverse might suffer from environmental damage.

 

This coin's a hands-down keeper!

+1. Agreed!

[JOBESSI]

Wow, what a wonderful LDS!! It's a solid AU-55 from what I can see, although the reverse might suffer from environmental damage.

 

This coin's a hands-down keeper!

+1. Agreed!

 

i concur

[Chris1976]

I was thinking more along the lines that it wouldnt grade due to enviromental damage on both obverse (in front of the forehead) and across a good sized area of the reverse. Plus it shows weak strike with uneven wear on the reverse smack dab in the middle.

 

-Chris#2

[BillJones]

I'd vote AU.

 

If it is Unc., it's only worth AU money because of the black spots on the reverse by the first "I" in "III."

 

It is certainly a decent original coin, but it's not worth doing hand springs over it.

[michael]

unc. details

[coinman_23885]

unc. details with weak strike and environmental damage