Tidy House Morgan

[mtnstyne]

Not as crisp as I had hoped but got it cheap so still happy. What would you grade it. Last time I posted one of these there were grades all over the map due to the toning. Let's see what ya think this time.

 

[cpm9ball]

Are those scratches on her face? It's hard for me to tell through the toning.

 

Chris

[mtnstyne]

I'll try to get some better pictures later, took those with my phone.

[James_OldeTowne]

MS-62

[JOBESSI]

How's the luster on this coin? It would bump it up a half grade. Pretty nice coin. as of now MS61...lost of luster Ms62

[kryptonitecomics]

MS63

[johnny9434]

ms 62 by the looks of it

[mtnstyne]

Click for some poor quality video from my phone...it shows some of the luster but mostly is out of focus.

 

 

[$ilverHawk]

MS60-61 very weak strike particularly the Obverse hairline. This date and mint mark is known for weak central area strikes. On the Reverse, very weakly struck arrow heads, breast feathers and lower wreath.

 

I like the toning. Very original skin Morgan.

 

$ilverHawk

[mtnstyne]

Thanks for your input, I had it at about MS62 myself. I am a sucker for Tidy House morgans that have great toning. I am not good at detecting AT vs NT so I am pretty confident when I buy these.

 

My cost for this plus the 2 1964 kennedy's was $75 and with melt being around $69 for the 3 coins I am pretty happy. The kennedy's have some cool toning as well.

[JOBESSI]

did you write on the plackard?

[coinman_23885]

I'll say MS62 so as long as those aren't truly deep scratches on the cheek. If those are scratches, you probably end up with an uncirculated "details" grade.