3 lovely busties * Grades in *

[x2rider]

Hi Folks

Got these a few months ago raw and sent them into NGc

One was a lock for the grade and what I expected . One was unexpected and one was a little higher than expected

But anyway have a guess at the grades

 

When I get them back , I 'll send to my Favourite coin photographer guy Sam to get imaged

[/img]

[/img] [/img]

[$ilverHawk]

Hard to grade from pics but I'll give it a shot.

 

1827 EF45 Nice toning

 

1832 AU58

 

1829 MS62

 

Great group of Busties.

 

$ilverHawk

 

 

[Coindude]

I would love to image those again for you!!

 

I'm thinking:

45

53 but this might be the surprise in a genuine holder due to dipping? No color

Lastly, I'll say AU62, it's gonna fall somewhere in there!!

[physics-fan3.14]

I'll say 45 (and quite nice!)

53 (net grade due to the dipping, if it grades)

and 58 (I like it!)

[Mark T]

1827- XF 40/45

1832 – Au 58 or MS 62

1829 - Au 58 or MS 63 (leaning strongly towards MS 63 )

 

[coinman_23885]

1827 0-131 = EF40

1832 O-111 = AU 55

1829 = technical AU58; wouldn't be surprised to see this in a MS62 holder

[johnny9434]

nice busties overall

1) xf 45

2) au 58

3) au 58

 

2 & 3 up for different grades as well

[x2rider]

Ok Now for the grades

 

The first is the 1827 . This graded au 53

This is the one that was higher than expected . I did think it was xf /au but not au53 . There is rub on the top of the hair and a little on the eagle head . But I'll take it

 

The next was the 1832 . This I thought would be au55/58 but came back as AU details improper cleaning. I would have to agree with the others now that I get to look at it a bit more that dipping could be the issue . Might have to send it off to PCGS because they don't mind dipping

 

And lastly was the 1829 . I thought that is was a lock for an au58 . But could of got a 62 on a good day . There is everso slight rub on the eagle head and front drapery but could of easily passed for UNC . I will probably send this one off for a good CACing becuase it is a real slider

 

Thanks Martin

[coinman_23885]

Martin there is a bit of ambiguity in your response for the 1829 Bust Half; are you saying that it graded AU58? Your post only confirms that you believe the coin to be between AU58 and MS62.

[Coindude]

Well done on the grades Martin!! I too am wondering... what did the 29 grade? I think you forgot to tell us!

[x2rider]

Woops AU58

[Coindude]

I think that's a good grade, but like most said, 62 wouldn't have surprised any of us!! Look forward to seeing them in hand!

[coinman_23885]

It is lovely enough that you could probably sell this for around MS62 price though. The white on the devices give the wear away or else I think that the coin may have found its way in to a MS holder even though I fully agree with the AU 58 grade.

[nunfa0]

Great coins Martin, you must have one of the best collections of busties in NZ if not the best!!

[x2rider]

Great coins Martin, you must have one of the best collections of busties in NZ if not the best!!

I don't think there are to many collecting these in NZ . Everytime I try to sell one of them they bid on them for novelty factor

[Mark T]

Ok Now for the grades

 

The first is the 1827 . This graded au 53

This is the one that was higher than expected . I did think it was xf /au but not au53 . There is rub on the top of the hair and a little on the eagle head . But I'll take it

 

The next was the 1832 . This I thought would be au55/58 but came back as AU details improper cleaning. I would have to agree with the others now that I get to look at it a bit more that dipping could be the issue . Might have to send it off to PCGS because they don't mind dipping

 

And lastly was the 1829 . I thought that is was a lock for an au58 . But could of got a 62 on a good day . There is everso slight rub on the eagle head and front drapery but could of easily passed for UNC . I will probably send this one off for a good CACing becuase it is a real slider

 

Thanks Martin

 

 

The 1832 was bagged because of a cleaning or maybe the coins surface was totally stripped because of an improper dip then it would also get bagged by PCGS. I would not re submit, save your money.

The 1829 is a perfect example of a strong Au58. Based on your photos that coin could have graded MS 62/63.

The 1827 – AU 53 is very generous – however the coin does have great eye appeal.

 

[jtryka]

Not having looked at the results, I would grade these:

 

XF-45, AU-50 cleaned XF details and AU-58.

 

That's the best I can do from the photos!

[jtryka]

Now that I looked at the grades, the real surpise was the 1827!