• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

This is why to never use a scanner when trying to show a coin...

6 posts in this topic

This is the Scanner Picture......

 

fa2d93ff.jpgfa2d9404.jpg

 

Now with a digi Cam... Cheap light....

 

f9ee4536.jpgf9ee4534.jpg

 

Now with even better light.. (Outside light coming in)

 

f9d98ffd.jpgf9d99003.jpgf9d9892f.jpg

 

 

Now you tell me which coin you want..... The first pic would not sell that coin.. the 2nd one mabye ..... and the 3rd even makes it better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the second one best, it reveals the luster and the irridescent toning. Perhaps a combination of the natural and artificial lighting would be most interesting. I used to dislike fingerprints and would never have bought a coin with a fingerprint, but I've changed my mind about that and wouldn't hesitate to buy a nice coin with a fingerprint on it. The good old days, when people could actually touch their coins...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd go with the 2nd set - coin looks "warmer" & more eye-appeal - but seems to show a lot of marks on the cheek. #3 seems somewhat dull & lifeless - which one looks the most like the coin in the "flesh"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites