• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Is this Washington Quarter star worthy?

Started by coinsarefun,

12 posts in this topic

coinsarefun

coinsarefun

Posted
Posted

Never tried for one, but this end roll toner sure is pretty and

didn't know if its * worthy :)

 

Its very difficult to capture all the colors on the reverse

but, I gave it a shot

 

Stefanie

 

 

 

a0393141-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Coindude

Coindude

Posted
Posted

Seriously doubt it. The colors are kinda mottled and not vivid enough. Of course, that's just me. I've seen worse in stars and I've seen better in non star holders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bartlesvilleok

bartlesvilleok

Posted
Posted
Seriously doubt it. The colors are kinda mottled and not vivid enough. Of course, that's just me. I've seen worse in stars and I've seen better in non star holders.

 

I agree with coindude

Link to comment
Share on other sites
michael

michael

Posted
Posted

Is this Washington Quarter star worthy?

 

 

not even close

 

but it doesnot mean it is a bad coin it is okie as far as washington quarters go

 

not below average but nothing special

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BillJones

BillJones

Posted
Posted

The coin looks run-of-the-mill to me and would not rate a star. The reverse toning is the result of storage in a Whitman flolder. I don't find it attractive, but that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thebeav

thebeav

Posted
Posted

I guess I would have to agree on the 'No Star'.

The luster looks 'milky' to me. That quality prevents the color from being vivid.

 

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Go to topic listing