POLL: New NGC Holder

[MunkyMan95]

Will you send your coins in to be reholdered?

[kryptonitecomics]

Not all....but could b quite a few

[zrlevin]

I would if I owned an NGC coin. I think I might even cross over a PCGS if I owned one of those.

[cpm9ball]

I only have one coin that would be appropriate for the new holder, and it is already in one. The only problem is that it is missing some of the edge lettering.

 

Chris

 

PS. Hi, guys! I'm glad to see someone stuck around here. I was getting so bored that I went back and read some of the threads 2002-2006. The only problem was that most of the photos are gone. I will say that is one of the reasons why I like my ACDSee program. I don't need a hosting service and they remain in the post for as long as I want.

[zrlevin]

Chris, I am actually in Boulder, CO at the moment...

[Dwaine]

I may send in some of my NGC coins to be reholdered, but I think I will want to see them first before I send them all.

[nwcs]

I see no reason to re-holder anything. Except for consistency it seems like spending money for little in return.

[MBA101]

I just won an 1818/7 CBH that I cannot use in my registry unless I send it in to be attributed as a Small 8 variety. Therefore, I may as well send in a bunch to be attributed, and holdered in the new holders.

[BillJones]

There are two reasons why I re-holder coins.

 

1. The coin is clearly under graded, and it is a slam dumk for a higher grade and there is money to be made.

 

2. The holder is so scrached up thatI can't stand looking at it.

 

So far re-holdering coins because the slab company changed the look of their holder, that's like a dog chasing its tail. It's a waste of time. And for a human chasing your tail is waste of money.

[straits-migration]

what if they find a flaw in the new holder and redesign it again?

Reholder it again and again?

 

why no definite date for the new holder?

awaiting more submission to finish their current stock of holders?

 

what about our present submission already in NGC? Could we ask them to wait till the new holder is launched before slabbing it?

 

[jackson64]

for me it's simply a matter of re-holdering about a dozen that have some nice edge lettering that I'd like to be visible....and maybe one of them I'll get a regrade and reholder ( I think NGC messed up giving this coin an AU58 when it is an MS65 of a weakly struck issue--the grader may not know much about old German States coinage)

[straits-migration]

needed to vent off some air in the last post...

 

for the past few months, dealing with a number of american companies including XXC made me more tired and dejected in the sense that I get better treatment from asian companies even if I'm just a small consumer

 

now I kinda understand why so many asian senior collectors simply refuse to hand over their collection for grading

[coinman1794]

There are two reasons why I re-holder coins.

 

1. The coin is clearly under graded, and it is a slam dumk for a higher grade and there is money to be made.

 

2. The holder is so scrached up thatI can't stand looking at it.

 

So far re-holdering coins because the slab company changed the look of their holder, that's like a dog chasing its tail. It's a waste of time. And for a human chasing your tail is waste of money.

 

Witht he recent counterfiet slab scare, i can see a lot of poeple wanting to get the latest style holder. Under normal circumstances, though, I'm with you--only reholder those slabs that need it, along with all the Early US lettered edge coins.