• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

One onehundredth

Member
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. There appears to be a faint remnant of a cud along the inside rim between the “O” and “A” on the reverse. Possible s-241? Still an R1, but neat! thank again !
  2. 🤣 Yes, and thank you for the differential.. Topics can become rather academic (or pedantic, semantic, etc..) the doctoral level of numismatics. I’m sure “Countermarks” are another topic of a 4 day seminar….
  3. Thanks for your thoughtful reply. Here’s an image of the reverse.
  4. Hello: I'm new to the world of collecting counterstapmed coins and I recently acquired the pictured 1802 large cent with an eagle, olive Branch, and an oval with "US" inside. In short, I'm stumped. I've searched Rich Harzog's extensive online resource: Complete List of Merchant Countermarked, Counterstamped Coins: A-C (richhartzog.com), which appears to be a transcription of Gregory G. Brunk's publication of merchant counterstamps, but doesn't include government stamps, which I believe this to be. Any thoughts on this? The style looks to be civil war era, but have a hunch this combination of symbols may well pre-date the civil war. Also, I'd be curious to get some opinions about the coin's obverse surfaces (outside of the counterstamp): damaged? I ask because are some areas of roughness on the obverse, but there's no porosity/unevenness/color change apparent, so I'm inclined to attribute the roughness to the planchet quality (vs. environmental damage) . Any and all feedback / opinions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you kindly
  5. I hadn’t considered the possibility of a counterfeit, although now I’m more intrigued… the coin tests 90%silver, is within all the measurement specs of a 57 SLQ and doesn’t have that tell-tale “waxy” appearance / feel, but indeed counterfeits have become more prevalent across all denominations and with exacting precision. I agree this example has many odd attributes and looking at it through that lens has opened my eyes! (No pun) thank you all for your thoughts/ input best, R
  6. Hello: This is an interesting 1857 SL 25c… In particular the reverse, with a double chinned eagle, cuds in the eagles mouth looking like a swollen tongue , right wing doubling, cud’s on the bottom of “ICA” and “TES”, a filled denticle between “F”and “A”, and a few extra feathers to the right on the bottom of the eagle’s right leg. I was curious if anyone has any thoughts on if this is known variety of seated liberty quarter or a one-off mint error? I’ve searched many online sources including ngc’s variety plus, and sorted through hundreds of high res images and haven’t come across this yet… Kind thanks in advance!