shellybass

This is the 1896s. I wouldn't think it worth grading. I think he bought it so that there wouldn't be a space in his book. He was just proud it was a complete set.

This is the reverse of the 1901s. There is an 1896s but it has alot of ware.

Both are ag3. I'm assuming the value is in the key date and mint.

I looked into the two that are encapsulated. I won't be replacing those any time soon. Turns out , he had the whole set. The 2 that are already graded are the 1901-s and the 1913-s. They have a mixed collection of wear. If they were stamps I'd say most are fine to very fine. Only a few are strongly worn.

My father acquired a large collection of coins. He handed things to me and my sisters on a regular basis. He loved collection then either giving them to kids and grandkids or handing them out to people. So unfortunately when he handed us those cases or books, in our minds it was like yay more coins. And we thought nothing of them. I'm a stamp collector. Not really into coins alot. But Dad recently passed so I've been going through some of the things he gave me for me and my kids. A set he gave me was a book and a role of barber quarters. 2 are graded by NGC but the rest are in a coin binder by date. If the coins are in the correct locations, he was only missing the 1913-s. Which to me says it was out of his range or is extremely rare. So my question- if I wish to get anymore of the set graded, which ones do you recommend? I know grading each coin isn't practical or necessary but how do you determine what in a set should be graded ? thanks