Robert S. Lahti

Golly I really hope you didn't all aid to why people would react to believe like that, implying to God's children with God's money what God's intent is for them with that attitude and that mouth. I'll pray for you.

No, I just don't like boring prose. I like using a very long and patiently developed way to not let one's grasp deteriorate, by what implication in assumption clouds perception before resolve reveals itself. I'm a writer, so that's just a thing I do now. Alot of people don't necessarily care to notice the difference.

There's plenty of these dies, not exactly this early of a stage, on Wexler Doubled Dies. Both 1959 and 1959D DDR

This should be good enough to garner plausible doubt to a remaining portion of removal surrounding the doubled full size pillar in the second port from the left of the same occuring designers initials on the class 2 reverse 1959 Lincoln Cent. The die known to be one of the most elusive Lincoln Cent Doubled Dies, is not in the die wear arena, not plausibly.

An actively installed doubled inner A from a removal line from a close AM, and a remaining errant image leg.

Modification took the shape of Liberty-T and dwelled among them for a short time. The lasting impression persisted on the 2 though.

You'd think having the flat squared end of the working hub 9, exposed as to its die misalignment, would validate why the body shows doubling.

Chicago, Illinois Currency Exchange, receiving change at the counter. Chicago Ave, two streets from Michigan Ave.

Staying focused on how resolve works together, a little of how this started, seeing as they were very private US Mint executions. The only area of the rusty die left is on Lincolns shirt of the 1958 cent which are all the pictures above, except the 1926. A die crack runs above VDB.

The last drop of crazy.

20 rolls. The most nuts, crazy can hold.

We can see T, how there is the form of the image still inside its allowance of the body, but that form becomes doubled outside of the bodies allowance leading to a lack of firm square seating. Because only some scattered doubling ends up on the class 2 1c 1959 reverse. FG, ONE CENT, M-ICA, UN

First 2, unrevised. Last 2, revised.

First 3 pictures: Before the strengthened restored obverse of 1959, it looked like this. The bottom of 9 shows a misaligned doubling with an errant 9 hubbed above, (under) which on Denver just happens to be missing the large loop tip. Last picture: The next is the full beautiful restored obverse of 1959, we all know. Just the R in its modification doubling. Doubling not only on the subsurface leg, but on the revised R face. Two types.

You want to know what a realistic listed doubled die reflects Class 7 doubling. How it is clear between years what the difference of change is. Liberty R has always had a slightly longer lead leg before the 1961 1c WWHO-(Wexler Doubled Dies) But during this working hub doubling, and after through Lincoln Memorial cent years, the back leg becomes slightly longer.

We can see it's true because the leader of the pack always has a goatee. So it's ok.

But likliness resolve says A forms had been approached for a far AM type in 1994.

Offset doubling to the upper lip.

Yeah, a long shot is what I chase. Your right. It's been a long shot. An errant image removed, doubled by it still remaining in the field. And that recorded style of impression of the coin from that hubbing. ...but single squeeze hubbing trials began in October 1985. Single squeeze, serif doubling on the main legend half of the removed N serif. I B,M, doubling in the center leaning towards the flat America. A more shallow impression America leads to quicker DDD. But there is no longer a seam for metal pushed around legends in DDD in the single squeeze Era. Where would a seam of second impression come from? Working dies have witnessed the flat America on 1985 dies. Master Dies had yet to be incorporated by single squeeze hubbing. A tilt did not allow a full impression. It only recorded what position the alignment was in.

Fine, conceded. The Denver looked a little too large to be usual.

We can see the 7 redie is what likely left the 5 with its pressure point die chip. #1 Is 1957, #2 is 1957D. 1957D does not have the applied serif tip 7, but still has the remaining outer 7 and die chip 5. The 1957 has the serif tip died over another front and the tip is doubled, plus the remaining outer 7 and die chip 5. The evidence being on two working dies is a requirement for a Class 7 modified hub doubled die. #1 is the first 3 pictures #2 is the 4th picture

Actually it's probable, conducting test strikes. I'd think the image was created on screen and has no valid url record to recall simply if deleted. When testing a new choice of design adjustment, the computer designer would need to leave the image in case the outcome is chosen FOR the original instead. That's how a modified hub doubled die is possible in the single squeeze hubbing era.