K Scott

Happened to me. Submitted to Conservation, a Seated Dime which I believed had artificial toning. They removed the toning, but it was returned with a Details/Cleaned 'grade'. The evidence of cleaning was obvious with the toning now gone. This was a "never again" experience for me. I agree with Sandon. Not worth the added expense.

Most, if not all members will reply stating this is not an error and not worth submitting. This happened after the coin left the mint and is considered post-mint damage (PMD). Both coins were likely squeezed together in a vice causing the impressions. Just my opinion. The best view of your coin for everyone would be without scope.

Thank you all for the kind feedback. Your responses affirm my original thoughts. I appreciate the comments on the coin's other attributes as well. I think rather than placing it back into the album, I'll store it in an air-tight holder--might stave off further darkening of those spots. Thanks again.

Hello All, I've been a fly on the wall for some time and have decided to drop my first post. I had some time recently to go through my Dad's collection; pouring through his old albums. He has a complete Franklin Half set with one date standing out among the rest. I believe it's a regular strike but it is so much nicer than the rest of the group--could this be a proof?. My understanding is that the strike quality for this series was a challenge because of the design. I figured I should just ask you all for your opinion. The bell lines on the reverse are also pretty distinct. I wonder if I may have an FBL here as well? I know the photos could be more clear, but this is my best attempt with the camera I have: Thank you in advance. We have a plethora of knowledge here.